Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHalblaub
Oh good the spider chart again. Someone made a good point, show the chart with the round circle being the requirement not the KC30.

Since the GAO ruled that extra credit should not have been given for exceeding the requirement this chart is misleading.

The IFARA number also required a lot of tweaking. Rules had to be changed to make it so the KC30 could even complete some of the missions.

But the most damning part of the GAO report is that there is a strong case that NG/EADS did not even meet all of the threshold requirements and therefore was not even eligible for the award.

I will agree that the KC30 can carry more cargo. But why didn't they agree to meet the depot requirement. Also why didn't they do the homework to show that they could refuel all the fixed wing aircraft.

So other than reposting the NG PR what do you have?

84 posted on 06/26/2008 5:10:50 PM PDT by djwright (I know who's my daddy, do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: djwright

A P.O.S. that cannot perform emergency break away proccedures. has a boom envelope problem, let alone a non working boom. and it takes up more parking spaces. but hey it hauls more. Not, thats what a C-17 does better.

but leave it to the backseat driver posting his EADS PR to whine some more. The GAO found that eads lied and someone took a bribe. Boeing should be awarded the contract now so we can get these birds flying


85 posted on 06/26/2008 9:53:08 PM PDT by cmdr straker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: djwright
Since the GAO ruled that extra credit should not have been given for exceeding the requirement this chart is misleading.

Several lines on the spider's net point to something else - effectiveness or efficiency.

Did you ever thought about why no extra credit was given?
You would buy a car that's 0.1 % cheaper but offers less space just because it fulfills your minimum requirements - 4 wheels, 5 seats, engine and a steering wheel?

The IFARA number also required a lot of tweaking. Rules had to be changed to make it so the KC30 could even complete some of the missions.

GAO denied exactly that claim by Boeing.

But the most damning part of the GAO report is that there is a strong case that NG/EADS did not even meet all of the threshold requirements and therefore was not even eligible for the award.

Did you know that Boeing also failed in field of unrefueled range.

I think the depot issue is more about aircrafts like A310 or 767 at the end of production. Last year 68 A330 were delivered and 198 more were ordered. Why NG didn't issue something to comply with this requirement is NG’s fault.

So other than reposting the NG PR what do you have?

The GAO decision which sustains NG PR.

86 posted on 06/27/2008 4:02:07 AM PDT by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson