Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saganite

I didn’t think his argument was naive. He succinctly stated the problem without going into a paragraph or two of technical details explaining weight distribution, tire footprints, runway strength, etc...

I think the weight and size issues are very important, with the weight being critical. Weight is a crucial factor in all airplane operations. Airport and airfield design uses weight and one of the main factors in determining overall operational capabilities. Take away 20% of my available airfields and that is a BIG hit.


26 posted on 06/20/2008 6:55:09 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Bryan24

“My best scientific wild guess is that the NG-EADS aircraft will be unable to operate out of at least 20% of the airfields that could accommodate the right-sized Boeing tanker”.

Even according to the author he’s just guessing, even guessing wild. I would like to see some Air Force numbers if that would be OK with you.


27 posted on 06/20/2008 7:00:37 AM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson