I have observed that no matter the proof, no matter the obvious, some will continue arguing against Boeing when they do not understand the requirement, the process, the rules and the events that actually happened-—it is like debating UFO true believers, facts and logic just get in the way.
Recently, in private conversation, Gen Fogleman “broke with the Air Force” over the way the source selection was handled.
Those that know Ron are fully aware that he, of all others in this world, cannot be bought, that he is a man of impeccable character and flawless judgment. He resigned early rather than throw people under the bus over the bombing of the USAF compound in Dhahran. He fought the Clinton White House constantly and resigned rather that compromise his service and honor.
Ron is retained by Boeing, he is so well respected and honored in and outside of the Air Force. He doesn't spew the party line, and he would NOT do that under any circumstances.
Best to you Paul, for your clear voice and fact-based reason. It is clear you have more patience than me when it comes to the “Oh yeah. . .Boeing is bad” crowd that simply won't quit.
the true experts are
1. Those who have worked or flown Tanker aircraft
2. Those who have worked Airlift/Tanker ops
3. Those who have overseen Air Force Contracts
4. Those who work or have worked for Aerospace Military industry.
Armchair quarterbacks are a dime a dozen and don't know snizzle. if you have never preflighted, flown or worked on a tanker aircraft you have no clue what you are talking about. I can tell you out of the 3 AIR REFUELING squadrons I deal with on a daily basis I have not run into one ZIPPERSUITED SUN GOD who has anything good to say about the EADS/NG airplane its too big, cannot perform specific emergency procedures, is made by SCAREBUS and not AMERICAN. There words.