Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MILITARY: Marine Corps appealing dismissal ruling for Chessani
North County Times ^ | June 18, 2008 | MARK WALKER

Posted on 06/18/2008 7:22:37 PM PDT by RedRover

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 last
To: billmor; jude24

I don’t believe the judge would have had the authority to dismiss without prejudice, without the possibility of appeal.

I’d be happy to hear I’m wrong, but I thought that decision could only be made by the Convening Authority, Gen Helland, who is the “supreme” judge in the case. And Helland would act on the advice of his own legal staff.

Also, I don’t believe all miitary lawyers are JAGs. LtCol Sullivan, for instance, is a civilian lawyer and a Marine reservist. I believe he has a separate line of reporting, up to Gen Helland’s Staff Judge Advocate.

Pinging someone who knows far more than me.


161 posted on 06/20/2008 6:08:54 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; lilycicero; Girlene
Keeping tabs.
162 posted on 06/20/2008 8:03:10 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Yes RR, your response is calm, level-headed, and reasonable here - although I think, maybe, you meant to say, "...the authority to dismiss without with prejudice, without the possibility of appeal.

Whatever the correct phraseology is, I believe you are correct.

The political situation that these fine Marines have been sucked into is outrageous, but the only way out is through the mud.

I believe these good men can and will get out, by going through.

I believe that those with eyes to see, will see - will see the ultimate value of men that endure.

I believe that the value of men that endure is eternal and incalculable.

163 posted on 06/20/2008 9:12:36 AM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
Whoops, yes, you're right--I got that wrong! One too many "withouts".

And you're right about the value of endurance. Somehow these men and their families have found a strength they probably never knew they had. It's allowed them, by and large, to stand together. And that has been crucial.

164 posted on 06/20/2008 10:11:14 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: All
The latest from the Thomas More Law Center...

Thomas More Law Center to Government - Time to End the Haditha "Fiasco"

ANN ARBOR, MI – For over two years, the federal government, the Far Left media and anti-war politicians have smeared the names of loyal Marines, spent millions of dollars to uncover the “Haditha massacre” that never occurred, and employed an army of Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) agents in what it described as the largest investigation in that agency’s history. To show for their efforts military prosecutors have lost 7 of the 8 cases they charged, the eighth case is still awaiting trial.

Earlier this week, the prosecutors suffered their latest setback when military judge Colonel Steven A. Folsom, USMC, dismissed all charges against LtCol Jeffrey Chessani, USMC, the highest ranking Marine officer facing “Haditha” charges. Despite this ruling, the government has indicated that it intends to pursue an appeal, which will continue the case and the expense of taxpayer money for many more months, if not longer.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, which is representing LtCol Chessani in the court martial, commented, “The investigation and prosecution of the Haditha Marines has been a fiasco. A military command decision should end it now—for the sake of the Corps, our nation and the Marines involved.”

Thompson continued, “Colonel Folsom’s ruling is rock-solid. If the government wants to continue wasting taxpayer dollars pursuing this case on appeal, we are more than committed to defending the military judge’s ruling, even if it means taking the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We intend to fight as tenaciously as LtCol Chessani’s Marines fought in Iraq. Enough is enough—it’s time to end this fiasco.”

In a detailed ruling, which took the military judge over an hour to deliver from the bench, the judge dismissed the charges on the basis of unlawful command influence, which he described as “the mortal enemy of military justice.” The government’s appeal will be heard initially by the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (NMCCA), which is located in Washington, D.C. A decision by that court could then be appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) and then even to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life through litigation, education, and related activities. It does not charge for its services. The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization. You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at www.thomasmore.org.

165 posted on 06/20/2008 2:49:10 PM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
.......A military command decision should end it now—for the sake of the Corps, our nation and the Marines involved.” ......

........“Colonel Folsom’s ruling is rock-solid. If the government wants to continue wasting taxpayer dollars pursuing this case on appeal, we are more than committed to defending the military judge’s ruling, even if it means taking the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We intend to fight as tenaciously as LtCol Chessani’s Marines fought in Iraq. Enough is enough—it’s time to end this fiasco.” ......


Couldn't agree more. Who will rail in Lt. Col S. M. Sullivan, Lt. Col Sean Sullivan, or whatever name he's using today? Game over. Time to end this. Col. Ewers poor (or lack of) advice to Gen. Mattis brought on a highly unusual UCI decision. Does the Marine leadership really want to stake its reputation on this one prosecutor's zealousness?
166 posted on 06/20/2008 10:10:05 PM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

We eat your own during war? I don’t get it.

I did my bit and my son’s doing his now, and I always told him before he went in that once your in, you’ll understand how the military watches out for their people, something that civilians will never understand.

And then the chickenshit starts...


167 posted on 06/25/2008 10:29:58 AM PDT by toddlintown (My kingdom for a beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

“What part of “sit down” by the military judge, Col. Folsom, did Lt. Col. Sullivan not understand?”

I’m afraid you misunderstood the judge. If he had meant the prosecution to sit down, he’d have dismissed WITH prejudice. That would mean they couldn’t refile charges. Essentially, he told them to do it over, and have someone make the decision to charge or not charge who wasn’t influenced by someone who was part of the investigation, or just give it up.


168 posted on 06/26/2008 10:34:01 AM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Old Student
If he had meant the prosecution to sit down, he’d have dismissed WITH prejudice. That would mean they couldn’t refile charges. Essentially, he told them to do it over, and have someone make the decision to charge or not charge who wasn’t influenced by someone who was part of the investigation, or just give it up.

Probably right. Any idea if the judge had filed WITH prejudice, if the prosecutors could still appeal? If so, this could have been drug out either way.
169 posted on 06/26/2008 11:00:39 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
“The scumbags will cry, ‘coverup!’.... no matter what happens.”

That, ladies and gentlemen, is what is truly motivating this entire debacle. It's a shame my generation didn't use more hard-core drugs and off themselves before they pulled this on another generation. I do so sincerely apologize and pray for justice. Son is still waiting to hear, but hope to be able to say “Semper Fi” shortly and truly have a dog in this hunt. Right now, I'm still just Civilian Jane feeling lower than whale caca that there are still folks who can do so much damage to those who are so brave.

170 posted on 06/26/2008 2:50:45 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

“Any idea if the judge had filed WITH prejudice, if the prosecutors could still appeal?”

If he had ruled it dismissed with prejudice the prosecutors could NOT appeal. Basically, it looks to me, he smacked them upside the head and said do it right!


171 posted on 06/26/2008 3:48:36 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
“Just it is President Bush responsibility to send young men and women to their deaths in a war it is also his responsibility to ensure that Military Justice is done by the letter of the law, meaning he cannot and must not interfere with the proceedings until they have run their course.”

What I resent is that so many people don't know this, despite the many, many years we've been discussing it. I was a kid when Lt. Calley was tried and convicted. I enlisted several years afterward, and a couple of years before we pulled out of Vietnam. I spent 24 years in the Air Force, and I've been retired for over a decade, and the people who depend on us to protect them still don't understand how things work. They watch JAG on TV and think that's it! I am starting to get really, really irrigated over this.

172 posted on 06/26/2008 4:13:25 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson