Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larry Sinclair, That Polygraph Just Won’t Go Away!
BNN ^ | 6/17/08 | Simon Barrett

Posted on 06/17/2008 1:40:56 PM PDT by pissant

There are some stories that just never seem to die. And the Larry Sinclair/Obama story from last February is still causing waves. The story as you may recall had Larry Sinclair alleging that he had participated in a homosexual relationship with Obama, and had also used cocaine with him.

The story was at best a doubtful one, but gained a good deal of traction with the more right wing press groups.

Larry Sinclair even agreed to take two polygraph tests, which, so the story goes, he failed miserably.

Well it looks like round two is just about to kick off. Sinclair is going to be speaking at the National Press Club in Washington, DC tomorrow (June/18), this no doubt will re-energize this seemingly tall story. Possibly of more interest is the press conference scheduled following the Press Club appearance.

Whitehouse.com was the organization that suggested Larry Sinclair take the polygraph test. After the initial polygraph expert examined the results and made his conclusions, Whitehouse.com was accused of taking a $750,000 bribe to suppress and or alter the results of the polygraph examinations.

Whitehouse.com claim that at tomorrows press conference they will release the results of the polygraph examinations, the reports of the experts, and a video of Mr. Sinclair taken while the examinations were being administered.

One suspects that there might be an ace or two up someone’s sleeve. This should be a fun event to follow.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: larrysinclair; obama; whokilleddonaldyoung
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Load up on the popcorn.
1 posted on 06/17/2008 1:40:57 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

How does this dismiss the claim that WH took money. I mean they are going to present their findings?


2 posted on 06/17/2008 1:44:40 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; justiceseeker93; ncfool; Free ThinkerNY; freekitty; oswegodeee

The more Obama’s background comes into question, the better, IMO.


3 posted on 06/17/2008 1:46:49 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

All Obama has to do is tell the media he was in a long-term homosexual relationship (relatively speaking) pending gay nuptials in California and it will be seen as a net positive.


4 posted on 06/17/2008 1:47:32 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Callahan

“That’s not the Larry Sinclair I know”


5 posted on 06/17/2008 2:06:21 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
One suspects that there might be an ace or two up someone's sleeve.

How many aces and bombshells has he promised thus far and has failed to deliver. Nope, starting to think more and more he is an Obama patsy to create false stories that distract from issue challenges and make any future accusations that may have a grain of truth, automatically questioned.

6 posted on 06/17/2008 2:07:53 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
”…but gained a good deal of traction with the more right wing press groups…

Where the hell are these ‘right wing press groups’ anyway? All I see is undying adulation (bordering on lust) from the MSM whenever they write about the Black Messiah.

7 posted on 06/17/2008 2:09:04 PM PDT by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead
"The more Obama’s background comes into question, the better, IMO."

Generally yes, but not when it is not a legitimate examination of his background but rather an examination of unsubstantiated stories are broadcast and then refuted making Obama look like the victim of evil propagandists.

8 posted on 06/17/2008 2:09:34 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant; ExTexasRedhead; LucyT; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj
I hate to rain on Larry Sinclair's parade, because I think he's probably accurate in his recollections.

Nonetheless, don't expect much of a media crowd for Sinclair's press conference tomorrow. In fact, contrary to the way the MSM might spin it, the smaller the crowd, the more credibility Sinclair probably has.

This reminds me somewhat of the press conference held in DC to announce that the "suicide note," alleged by government investigations to have been written by Vincent Foster, was found to be a forgery written by others, according to three world-class forensic document examiners. Although that announcement indicated strongly that Foster's death was a homicide and the phony "suicide note" was part of a cover-up, few attended that most important press conference and the explosive finding of the handwriting experts received little attention in the MSM

9 posted on 06/17/2008 2:12:36 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

The press already is protecting the dirtball. If Larry is legit, and it is looking like he might very well be, it will be up to us to force feed the press this story, which is exactly what LS is trying to do.

If Larry is bluffing, it will be just one more of the rumors that they have put to rest.

If Obama can survive revelations of a close relationship with Ayers and Rev. Wright, and have the entire MSM waxing poetic about him, then it is going to take a dead woman or a live boy to derail the narrative.


10 posted on 06/17/2008 2:13:33 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
I spent a lot of time with that “note.” It was not a forgery, but it was not a suicide note either. It was a “rehearsal to quit note.” On the basis of this note the psychological expert concluded suicide.

Later the FBI examined all the evidence some months after things were returned to the owners. They found sunflower seeds in Vince Foster's pocket just like the seeds in the sock that contained the gun from home. This was more convincing than the the “note;” however, it never received much publicity.

FWIW about 15% of all suicides are out of the blue and without any warning. If Vince Foster suicided he was in this 15% since he never threatened or discussed suicide with anyone and his two children accompanied him to work on the day of his death. They noted nothing out of the ordinary.

One of those puzzles amenable to endless spinning and conspiracy theories. So far, no one has proved anything substantial.

11 posted on 06/17/2008 2:20:53 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

It depends on the evidence Sinclair produces. If he produces corroboration from the limo driver, Obama is toast. If he produces the phone records that Donald Young was indeed calling him (he claims this in an affidavit to the CPD), then things will get very interesting.

The best indication that there is some truth to his claims is that the left is totally up in arms and trying to get the NPC to cancel is appearance.


12 posted on 06/17/2008 2:22:02 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

An examination of unsubstantiated claims that are about to become more substantiated tomorrow. Just sit back and enjoy it, and quit fretting.


13 posted on 06/17/2008 2:23:33 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ArchAngel1983

I guess he meant the 4 or 5 blogs that covered it? I guess.


14 posted on 06/17/2008 2:24:11 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

It doesn’t dismiss anything, neither do the results of any polygraph.


15 posted on 06/17/2008 2:25:43 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

I agree Redhead. Go Larry Go


16 posted on 06/17/2008 2:26:15 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Callahan

He’ll lose 75% of the black vote instantaneously, but would carry San Fran with 99.97% of the vote.


18 posted on 06/17/2008 2:28:09 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

wh dot com is the porn site, right? I wouldn’t take anything they had to say at face value, OTOH, I like them more than AP. LOL!


19 posted on 06/17/2008 2:28:57 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Catch the Korean Wave, one Bae Yong Joon film at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Good old Barney. I’m sure, like barney, Obama can keep being re-elected to the Senate.


20 posted on 06/17/2008 2:29:31 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson