Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
The ACLU is uncomfortable with the idea of “critical thinking” in science class.
4 posted on 06/17/2008 9:09:35 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Tailgunner Joe

You are so right! The irony here is that it takes as much “faith” (if not more!) to believe in evolution as it does to believe in a creator. Since neither can be proved by traditional scientific method (observation, testing of hypotheses, and ability to re-create the conditions to verify results), some have seen fit to re-define the term “science” in an attempt to promote their particular theory. Evolution is just that - a theory. Why should it be given more prestige than it deserves?


7 posted on 06/17/2008 9:18:36 AM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The ACLU is uncomfortable with the idea of “critical thinking” in science class.

"Critical thinking" is a creationist propaganda line designed to sneak a narrow fundamentalist view of religion into science classes.

Real critical thinking is absolutely the last thing creationists want applied to their beliefs. But under this new law, look for exactly this to happen -- and there is nothing they can do about it.

8 posted on 06/17/2008 9:18:45 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson