Maggie Gallagher on "Gay Marriage" in California: Redefinition Revolution

The left wants to use gay marriage to destroy the institution of the family. Once the family has been destroyed the state can then impose the morality du jour, and define anyone who opposes it as a criminal.

Less than a decade later, Eric Erbelding from the perch of his legally recognized Massachusetts gay marriage, is quite comfortable explaining to the New York Times that “Our rule is you can play around because, you know, you have to be practical.”
Eric elaborates why he think it works for gay men: “I think men view sex very differently than women. Men are pigs, they know that each other are pigs, so they can operate accordingly. It doesn’t mean anything.”

This comment needs to be trumpeted by the folks pushing for the amendment in CA. Voters need to know just why they're being asked to deny 'marriage' to homosexual. Homosexual activists are not looking for legal marriage, in the sense of everyone else's idea of the institution, which implies spouses' fidelity to each other, they're looking for societal approval of their sex obsessed lifestyle.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.