Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California economy boosted by gay marriage bonanza
AFP via Yahoo! ^ | Jun 15, 2008 | Tangi Quemener

Posted on 06/17/2008 6:15:26 AM PDT by Brilliant

California's economy is poised for a multi-million-dollar windfall as same-sex marriages get underway here Monday, with the tourist sector eyeing a bonanza as gays and lesbians flock to the state to tie the knot.

Analysts say that a mini-industry will sprout up as California prepares to become the only US state that will allow gays and lesbians from outside the region to get hitched on its soil. Massachusetts, the only other US state to allow same-sex marriage, forbids non-residents from exchanging vows there.

That fact leaves California free to monopolize the same-sex wedding market.

According to a University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) study published earlier this week, around 51,000 of the 102,000 same-sex couples living in California are expected to marry over the next three years.

A further 67,500 same-sex couples from other states that are likely to recognize their vows are expected to come to California during the same period to get married, the study found.

"Spending by resident same-sex couples on their weddings and by out-of-state couples ... will boost California's economy by over 683.6 million dollars in direct spending over the next three years," the UCLA study reported, adding that the new industry would create around 2,100 new jobs.

Jack Kyser, Senior Vice President and Chief Economist of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation, told AFP that same-sex marriages would lift the local tourist sector as fears of recession gripped the industry.

"There's going to be an economic impact, and this will be a welcome boost for the travel and tourism industry, which is a little bit concerned about the impact of the economy on traditional tourism," Kyser told AFP.

Kyser said the majority of gays also represented the most sought-after consumer demographic -- "DINKS" or "dual income no kids."

Even though some rural conservative areas of California "were not thrilled" by the same-sex marriage ruling, many districts such as Los Angeles and San Francisco are already marketing themselves as "gay-friendly" destinations.

"With all its sights and attractions -- and a heritage of tolerance -- gay-friendly Los Angeles will soon be the perfect gay and lesbian wedding destination," Los Angeles tourist office declared on its official website.

In West Hollywood, the gay hub of Los Angeles, businesses are preparing for the same-sex marriage windfall.

Zoe Caratas, Sales Director of the Ramada Plaza hotel in West Hollywood, told AFP that occupancy rates had soared since the California Supreme Court overturned the same-sex marriage ban on May 16.

"It has definitely increased the occupancy rate, especially for next week," Caratas said. "We are almost completely sold out on Tuesday (when marriage licenses will become available to couples), and the same goes for the remainder of the week. Normally, our occupancy is not as high during the week."

Caratas said the hotel was offering a special 599-dollar "Honeymoon Package" which includes two-nights accommodation, a complimentary bottle of champagne and free parking.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: deadlysins; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; pervertpowe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Looks like the libs are getting pretty desperate in CA, if they are going to be changing their marriage laws in order to attract hotel business.
1 posted on 06/17/2008 6:15:26 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Just think what they could do for the economy if they legalized pedophilia! To libs, making money off sin good, making money off an actual product bad.


2 posted on 06/17/2008 6:19:14 AM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Sure - a multi-million dollar boom in treatments for STD’s, GBS, and chronic vaginitis.
3 posted on 06/17/2008 6:22:05 AM PDT by xcamel (Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Who has the orgy butter and vibrator concession?


4 posted on 06/17/2008 6:22:59 AM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Wow, a boon for the Lawyers too, divorces!


5 posted on 06/17/2008 6:23:20 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (If everyone stays home and no one votes will Congress disappear?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

What a great reason to embrace this. MONEY! I guess we indeed will sell our soul for some trinkets.


6 posted on 06/17/2008 6:25:14 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Five years later:

California custody cases taking seven years to complete due to family courts being bogged down with gay divorce. Welfare at all time high due to delay for court ordered child support.


7 posted on 06/17/2008 6:31:13 AM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

multi-million-dollar windfall - WOW! That should make a huge impact in a 1.7 trillion dollar economy.


8 posted on 06/17/2008 6:31:33 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Wow, a "multi-million dollar windfall" for a state that's billions in debt. Woo-hoo!
9 posted on 06/17/2008 6:32:04 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
California economy boosted by gay homosexual marriage bonanza

Fixed.
10 posted on 06/17/2008 6:33:18 AM PDT by monkeycard (There's no such thing as too much ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl

“Judge Can’t Decide Which Man to Screw in Gay Divorce!”


11 posted on 06/17/2008 6:33:35 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
California might as well legalize prostitution and all other forms of debauchery ... think of all the money that will rake in. Besides, they're already acting like cheap whores.
12 posted on 06/17/2008 6:34:12 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (I tried to explain that I meant it as a compliment, but that only appears to have made things worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl

“Judge Can’t Decide Which Man to Screw in Gay Divorce!”


13 posted on 06/17/2008 6:34:21 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

14 posted on 06/17/2008 6:34:29 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

>>>Looks like the libs are getting pretty desperate in CA, if they are going to be changing their marriage laws in order to attract hotel business.

This is no different then how Nevada cashed in on the divorce trade back when most states made it difficult or impossible to divorce. With lawyer fees and a 6 week residency requirement, Reno divorces were big business. A California state license will be small change in comparison.

Wedding fees are whatever the couple choose, and will vary from a few dollars to the minister up to tens of thousands for extravaganzas. That’s where California is expecting to benefit.

One more thing, these weddings will remain valid even if California voters later repeal the court ruling. Ex post facto laws retroactively making illegal that which was legal conduct at the time are forbidden by the Constitution.


15 posted on 06/17/2008 6:36:13 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I see that “top man ... bottom man” skit of The Three Stooges in a totally different light now.


16 posted on 06/17/2008 6:36:24 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (I tried to explain that I meant it as a compliment, but that only appears to have made things worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

“According to a University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) study published earlier this week, around 51,000 of the 102,000 same-sex couples living in California are expected to marry over the next three years.”


Half of the same sex couples will get married? I will belive it when I see it. Give it about six months when the word gets around the hair salons about how expensive and, well, “not fun” divorce can get.


17 posted on 06/17/2008 6:41:55 AM PDT by freedomlover (Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

So normal heterosexual couples who want to marry have to send in line behind demented perverts? Yeah, that’ll be just great for the state. Time to change the legal system. It’s broken.


18 posted on 06/17/2008 6:47:42 AM PDT by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevio

“To libs, making money off sin good, making money off an actual product bad.”

California’s “SIN BASED ECONOMY”.... That’s a good name for it.


19 posted on 06/17/2008 6:48:56 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
According to a University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) study published earlier this week, around 51,000 of the 102,000 same-sex couples living in California are expected to marry over the next three years. A further 67,500 same-sex couples from other states that are likely to recognize their vows are expected to come to California during the same period to get married, the study found.

Every time gay marriage has been legalized in a new jurisdiction, the estimates for filings have proven wrong by at least a factor of 10. It speaks to the idiotic corruption of the social scientists and their enablers in the press that laughable "data" are presented with credibility.

20 posted on 06/17/2008 6:58:07 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson