Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Savage Beast
The reason that I suggest a revolt within the Republican Party is that it has been done before, and successfully. In fact, there has been a cycle of revolutions and counter-revolutions within Republican ranks for 50 years now; a long-term contest between conservatives and moderates.

In 1964, Conservatives secured the nomination of Barry Goldwater from the liberal establishment - he lost, of course, but helped launch the political career of Ronald Reagan, who became governor of California in 1966. Moderates reasserted themselves in 1968, with the nomination of Richard Nixon.

In 1976, Conservatives put on a show at the RNC, where a sea of cowboy hats cheered on Ronald Reagan in thrilling act of insurgency against President Ford, who won the nomination but lost to Jimmy Carter. Reagan, of course went on to trounce Carter and re-establish conservative ascendancy within the Republican Party.

By 1988, the moderates were back, with George H.W. Bush doing his "kindler, gentler" thing. After Gentle George was shellacked by Billy Bob Clinton, conservatives decided to make a Congressional stand and in 1994, led by Newt Gingrich, moved into control of Congress for the first time in two generations.

14 years later, that's all gone. We have a weak conservative President and a Democrat Congress and a public in a sour mood. We have an older, moderate "maverick" Republican as presumptive nominee against a young, doctrinaire left-wing Democrat. I don't see that as a very promising match-up for the older guy, hence my interest in another little cowboy party at the RNC.

92 posted on 06/17/2008 9:04:06 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Peace is Not The Question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: andy58-in-nh
Well, the bottom line is that Obama and as many Democrats as possible must be defeated. The back-and-forth swing within the Republican Party shows that we can recover from the effects of a RINO. I do not think the country could survive a Leftist Radical President with Democrat majorities in Congress.

Of course it would be better to nominate a conservative Republican, but, if the choice is between a moderate Pub and a Democrat, I'll take the Pub--and especially if the Democrat is an anti-American Radical Communist such as we have looming on the horizon.

94 posted on 06/17/2008 1:57:06 PM PDT by Savage Beast (VOTE REPUBLICAN! = VOTE ANTI-DEMOCRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson