Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DakotaGator
Well, Rush had this exactly right yesterday (and actually, I wrote about this on FR on Saturday---"Wall to Wall Russert Coverage" http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2031005/posts).

The drive-bys are mourning the loss of their monopoly on the news, on their power, and on their ability to control elections. Rightly or wrongly, Russert was the last of the "trusted men." There is no one out there now who comes close, and they are all perceived for what they truly are, political hacks disguised as "objective journalists."

My outrage was that not one of our fallen warriors gets a tenth the coverage that Russert has received; the acquitted Hadith Marines have not received a tenth the coverage he received---yet who in the long run has performed a more valuable service to our country?

20 posted on 06/17/2008 4:29:32 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: LS

The only reason for any mention of our fallen warriors by the DBM is to gin up anti war fever.


25 posted on 06/17/2008 5:04:20 AM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: LS
Concur with all of your comments.

Especially significant was this one (which bears repeating):

My outrage was that not one of our fallen warriors gets a tenth the coverage that Russert has received; the acquitted Hadith Marines have not received a tenth the coverage he received---yet who in the long run has performed a more valuable service to our country?

30 posted on 06/17/2008 9:50:24 AM PDT by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson