Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge rules for White House in e-mail controversy [not subject to the Freedom of Information Act]
Yahoo ^

Posted on 06/16/2008 8:22:58 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Republican Extremist

this is a bad decision.

It is a mistake to view it as a dems vs gop issue. It is more a duopoly vs. the people issue, and we just lost. The party elites of gop and dnc have VASTLY more in common they either do with us.

Giving this kind of power to the executive is a terrible idea.


41 posted on 06/17/2008 3:15:29 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We know how the media will spin THAT.


42 posted on 06/17/2008 5:37:14 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Terrorist organizations worldwide endorse Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Seriously: Isn’t the Freedom of Information Act really just binding on the “little people”?


43 posted on 06/17/2008 5:56:21 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

The hard discs that went missing during the Clinton administration were taken by the Chinese. The agent in Los Alamos was caught, and a federal judge had him freed.


44 posted on 06/17/2008 6:00:40 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Terrorist organizations worldwide endorse Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
it is not that hard to make their system auto-archive everything.

why fix it "if it ain't broken"? sarcasm is intended here. I gotta boss that doesn't even want us to know when an email has been read by a recipient inside the company. It's ridiculous!

45 posted on 06/17/2008 1:39:13 PM PDT by jerri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lord_Baltar

Yes, I will. There is a seperation of powers for a reason, and we can’t selectively be for or against it. I’m for the Framer’s intent, no matter who is President.


46 posted on 06/18/2008 12:41:20 PM PDT by Republican Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

The power hasn’t been given. It’s already there. It was just recognized, yet again.


47 posted on 06/18/2008 12:43:05 PM PDT by Republican Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson