Let me take a wild guess.
If they are shooting at our troops then they are taking up arms agains the US.
I’m quite sure those being shot at will know they are being shot at.
But for you looney lefties you would want evidence that they were actually shooting at the troops who were being shot at.
This is where the evidence part comes in and the whole rights thing you like stops the battle to preserve evidence so you sitting in your chair can be satisfied that the rights of the terrorists are not being violated.
It’s more of your insane left wing craziness.
Do you know what would actually happen at a habeas proceeding? What is at stake? What must the US prove through evidence / sworn testimony?
It is not a high standard. Criminals get remanded all the time.