Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson
You didn’t read the case did you? Exactly what one of the detainees was denied was the right to prove he was not a member of Al Qaida.

LOL< I read the majority opinion and the dissents. And I know from you're arguments here that you are functionally illiterate where both are concerned.

ANd there's no reason to take the Lords name in vain because you misundertood what I wrote, I'm happy to clarify.

By saying that the military will keep citizens unlawfully you have accused them of knowingly violating their oaths.

Should they be as outraged at your direct accusation as you are by assuming incorrectly that the accusation was made to you?

This is where you foot meets your mouth Andy. Can't wait to hear this!

138 posted on 06/15/2008 5:02:02 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

Where did I violate my oath under the constitution? We are going nowhere until you answer that scurrilous goddamned charge.


140 posted on 06/15/2008 5:06:37 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07

And actually they don’t have to be members of al qaeda. They simply have to be taking up arms against the US.
This strawman of his falls miles short too.
Typical for lefties.


141 posted on 06/15/2008 5:06:52 PM PDT by smoketree (the insanity, the lunacy these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07

Where did I violate my oath under the constitution?


144 posted on 06/15/2008 5:13:25 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson