“If they aren’t “persons,” Barry, what are they? Dogs? Cats? Rutabagas??” - That’s always been the sticking point for me. A baby looks and acts and in fact IS completely different than an adult, so why do some “people” refuse to accept that an embryo/unborn child, while looking/being completely different than an adult, is a human being? It’s hard to explain, but there are different stages of being a person. Lucky for Obama his typical white mom thought it fit to give birth to him.
In Obama's case, he refuses to grant the rights of citizenship, indeed, the rights of "personhood" to a baby (not an embryo or a fetus, but a born baby, completely separated from the mother and breathing American air on American soil) because the baby's mother didn't want the child to be born, and had wanted an abortion.
"Yes ma'am, you signed up for an abortion and we're not going to let a little insignificant fact like the kid being born alive prevent you from getting that abortion."
These same people would not contend that the not-yet-born colt growing, changing daily and being nurtured within the body of its dam (i.e. mother)is not a living horse in a very early stage of its development.