Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Confirm That Parts Of Earliest Genetic Material May Have Come From The Stars
Physorg ^ | 6-13-3008 | Imperial College London

Posted on 06/13/2008 3:26:13 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 06/13/2008 3:26:17 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Confirm? Evidence? Sounds like they’re trying to “prove” something.


2 posted on 06/13/2008 3:31:46 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I forgot “We believe”.


3 posted on 06/13/2008 3:32:31 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

How is it that anybody can confirm that something may have happened? Is this what passes for science anymore? No wonder. Call us post-scientific.


4 posted on 06/13/2008 3:34:27 PM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Ha ha ha. Confirmation that something may have happened.
5 posted on 06/13/2008 3:36:19 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Oh boy.

That’s great.

I love reading about these scientifically validated hypothetically conjectured guesses. They are so...scientific.


6 posted on 06/13/2008 3:38:27 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (If Hillary is elected, her legacy will be telling the American people: Better put some ice on that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

7 posted on 06/13/2008 3:39:01 PM PDT by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
I just confirmed that the time I found my buddy passed out on the golf course of the Fort Polk Officers Club in 1960 might have been because he aced the second hole. Of course I have to ignore the fact that it was at 2300 hours on a Friday night and he was clad only in his BVDs and didn't even own a set of clubs.
8 posted on 06/13/2008 3:44:29 PM PDT by CHEE (Oh, give me land, lots of land.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

A Scientific Fad.


9 posted on 06/13/2008 3:45:53 PM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam; GodGunsGuts

Scientists?

How can we call them scientists if they can confirm something that is at odds with all physical evidence?

propagandists is what they are.


10 posted on 06/13/2008 3:48:41 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American History)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Well, there goes the Great Spaghetti Monster theory.


11 posted on 06/13/2008 3:51:41 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak
"Because meteorites represent left over materials from the formation of the solar system, the key components for life -- including nucleobases -- could be widespread in the cosmos. As more and more of life's raw materials are discovered in objects from space, the possibility of life springing forth wherever the right chemistry is present becomes more likely."

1 in 10^39.99999 as opposed to 1 in 10^40?

12 posted on 06/13/2008 3:53:03 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American History)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Uracil and xanthine cannot form spontaneously on earth?

Assuming the meteorite wasn't contaminated by landing on earth (in which every living organism makes uracil), assuming the molecules on a meteorite could survive the burning and crash landing, assuming that the meteorites were a significant source of biomolecular precursors that somehow didn't or couldn't form in significant amounts on Earth, I might be inclined to listen to them.

That is a lot of assumptions. A physicist once asked someone who made a hypothesis that fit (a bit too close) to his observations “How many parameters?” “Four” the guy admitted “Give me four parameters and I can fit an elephant! Five and I can make him wiggle his trunk.”

The formation of biological molecules spontaneously is not a problem, and we needn't invoke the ‘great cosmic life contamination’. Getting them to metabolize energy in order to replicate their structures is something else entirely.

13 posted on 06/13/2008 3:58:54 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Another case of pagan scientists defying the Creator of the universe.......I have read the last chapter......science boys lose!


14 posted on 06/13/2008 4:15:49 PM PDT by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

It does NOT say that life came from outside of the Earth, and it does NOT say that genetic material came from outside of the Earth. It says that material from outside of the Earth MAY have been useful in the process that led to the appearance of life on Earth.

However, I expect the headlines to say “Science confirms extraterrestrial origin of life”.


15 posted on 06/13/2008 4:15:57 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

...Or maybe it came from God.

But what do I know? I’m an ignorant, gun-toting bitter Bible-thumping white Christian male.


16 posted on 06/13/2008 4:16:21 PM PDT by figgers3036
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Don

Science is diametrically opposed to Christianity? You cannot be a scientist and a Christian?


17 posted on 06/13/2008 4:19:42 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shineon

Scientist cannot confirm anything and qualify it for a “may” possibility. If it is confirmed, it means that it is is confirmed. There is no “may”. I personally will take God at his word and believe no matter what scientists confirm. They once confirmed the earth was flat.


18 posted on 06/13/2008 4:55:54 PM PDT by carcar (Carlos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: carcar

Psalm 121

I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help.

My help cometh from the LORD, which made heaven and earth.

He will not suffer thy foot to be moved: he that keepeth thee will not slumber.

Behold, he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep.

The LORD is thy keeper: the LORD is thy shade upon thy right hand.

The sun shall not smite thee by day, nor the moon by night.

The LORD shall preserve thee from all evil: he shall preserve thy soul.

The LORD shall preserve thy going out and thy coming in from this time forth, and even for evermore.


19 posted on 06/13/2008 5:08:42 PM PDT by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam
Professor Mark Sephton, ... believes this research is an important step in understanding ...

My belief ... and a token ... gets me a ride to WalMart on the county transit.

20 posted on 06/13/2008 5:32:49 PM PDT by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson