I think this article is being deliberately misleading.
I remember reading on one of the FLDS websites that ‘all the children are with their mothers’. So if that is true, what are they actually saying here.
Note the use of the word ‘households’.
Also note the line that says ‘most of the mothers have not returned to the LDS compound on the advice of their attorneys’.
So what I think they are actually saying is that the MAJORITY of mothers and children (i.e. HOUSEHOLDS) are still living elsewhere and not at the compound.
another one, where the title is not borne out by the srticle.
Good point. If the kids are back and not at the ranch I wonder how much of this is being footed by the taxpayers?
“So what I think they are actually saying is that the MAJORITY of mothers and children (i.e. HOUSEHOLDS) are still living elsewhere and not at the compound.”
That is, of course, very possible too.
If that were to be true, then:
Why would the ‘media’ (a local Texas Newspaper website) feel constrained to having to ‘couch’ the concept of the ‘news’ in such a confusing way?