Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain: Guantanamo Ruling One of the ‘Worst Decisions’ in History
Fox News ^ | June 13, 2008 | Foxnews.com

Posted on 06/13/2008 12:09:36 PM PDT by DCRoush

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-294 next last
To: processing please hold

Yep, but that’s how it is and I don’t intend to pretend otherwise or make myself neurotic over it. I’ll need my energy and my wits to fight it where I can and cover my rear where I have to.


221 posted on 06/13/2008 9:50:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I’ll need my energy and my wits to fight it where I can and cover my rear where I have to.

Exactly what we're doing. We'll work on getting conservatives elected on the local and state level.

222 posted on 06/13/2008 9:54:33 PM PDT by processing please hold ( A gov. big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Do you think McCain will? I don’t. This ruling is in perfect synch with his philosophy - whether he wants to admit it or not.


223 posted on 06/13/2008 10:28:06 PM PDT by Bull Market (Do you like McCain? Then be a maverick just like him, and vote for Barack Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Blue Turtle
This decision is NOT against the Bush Administration.

No Bush's decision to abide by the Supreme Court Decision, is against the United States, God when will this Wimp go away. Tell me what he would have to lose, by standing up to this tyrannical court?

224 posted on 06/13/2008 11:07:55 PM PDT by itsahoot (We will have world government. The only question is whether by conquest or consent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DCRoush
For those who might be interested, here is the link to the actual Supreme Court ruling on this issue. This is the actual source, from http://www.supremecourtus.gov.

Dissents begin on Page 82.

Boumediene et al. v. Bush, President of the United States, et al.
225 posted on 06/14/2008 2:14:22 AM PDT by EasySt (The Republican is a Democrat, the Democrat is a crooked Socialist, and the Socialist is a Communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants
Johnson v Eisentragger establishes the principle that if combatants are outside US Territory they are not entitled to a Writ. Both McCain's desire and this recent decision grant the right to a Writ. McCain because bringing them to Leavenworth would make them CONUS detainees and SCOTUS basically reversed Johnson. Think about it this way, why else was GITMO established? Well, because military and AG and SG lawyers wanted to keep them someplace where we had control but they could not get the writ.

Again this is the problem with McCain (and apparently a lot of his supporters) they make decisions without understanding the consequence. I do not believe McCain wants to go down the path of Constitutional rights for terrorists but that is what happens.

Same goes for campaign reform, illegal immigration, vibrant capital markets, etc, he has one idea but does not think through the consequences of is actions.

226 posted on 06/14/2008 6:17:14 AM PDT by Sunnyflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: RJL; EveningStar

EveningStar,

Here is the way to think about this:

1) Bush - keep prisoners in GITMO to avoid a federal judge ruling on a writ (Johnson v Eisentragger)
2) Recent SCOTUS - we don’t care where they are give them access to federal courts.
3) McCain - close GITMO bring them to Leavenworth where they are CONUS detainees and get access to federal courts.

I’m not saying McCain WANTS them to get federal court access but that is the net effect of his position - and that MY FRIEND is the problem with McCain.

Same goes for capital markets. He wants more transparency. He proposes regulations. Much more capital markets activities go offshore and the NET EFFECT is less transparency. If McCain has his way all US trading of commodity futures will end up in London, Hong Kong, Singapore, or the Middle East.


227 posted on 06/14/2008 6:24:52 AM PDT by Sunnyflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants

“The legislation that I had cited, S.3930, [provides military commissions the jurisdiction to try any offense made punishable by this chapter (articles 904 and 906 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or the law of war by an alien unlawful enemy before, on, or after September 11, 2001.]

You keep making claims like ‘McCain is too stupid to know this...The really amazing thing is I don’t think McCain and some posters get it. Stupid.’ Yet you don’t even appear to be familiar with this legislation that contradicts your claims.”

The legislation does not apply inside the CONUS. Sorry. McCain can say” I’m going to make a law that makes it illegal to have an abortion anywhere in the United States” and it would not be worth the paper it was printed on.

McCain is not running for emperor.

Case law allows writ for detainees inside the CONUS and that is Constitutional according to the courts.


228 posted on 06/14/2008 6:33:26 AM PDT by Sunnyflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

“Thank you for the information. “

When ever McCain proposes something you have to ask “what are the ramifications.” He apparently does not. McCain-Finegold is a prime example. He honestly I believe intended to give up a little slice of the First Amendment to get money out of politics. But look what happened - more money and harder to trace money.


229 posted on 06/14/2008 6:37:21 AM PDT by Sunnyflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Just call him President Kennedy. I’m outraged by this decision. I wonder if the Chief Judge has any extra authority to “stay” this decision indefinitely since the President has announced that he will look into creating new law to overcome this outrage.

I hope that in his Presidential radio address he addresses this today; but given he is in Europe right now, he probably won’t. But he should, and he should openly state this is an abuse of judicial powers.


230 posted on 06/14/2008 6:38:29 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: gdani

Well, yeah, they’re filing pro se. And since they are filing pro se, judges don’t always hold them to technical standards, so long as there is any way they can be found to have stated a claim.

You are standing on technical grounds and that doesn’t work in today’s judicial system in regard to the prison system.


231 posted on 06/14/2008 6:48:55 AM PDT by fightinJAG (RUSH: McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton longer than we've been in Iraq, and never gave up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: gdani
I've been practicing law for multiple decades now, but let's go to a real authority, such as Encarta:

Today inmates may petition either state or federal courts through several avenues. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act of 1976, inmates may allege intentional torts, such as assault, as well as negligence by the prison administration. Examples of negligence include deliberate indifference to the medical or health needs of inmates or improper training of jail or prison personnel. The most frequent avenue for inmate lawsuits is habeas corpus actions. Writs of habeas corpus may challenge three things: (1) the fact of confinement; (2) the length of confinement; and (3) the nature and conditions of confinement, including overcrowding.

And included in the "nature and conditions of confinement" is anything, including diet, hairstyle, etc., that the prisoner can dream of. A federal prosecutor sees LOADS of these habeas cases filed every week.

That said, yes, since these inmates are filing pro se, a lot depends on where they got the complaint they copied and what that previous inmate filed. They also use the FTCA and straight constitutional claims. But it's not incorrect to use "habeas" as a way to MAKE THE POINT that the SCOTUS ruling will dramatically increase inmate filings on all kinds of ludicrous grounds.

Of course, that could be instructive, too. ;)

Anyway, here's the link for the above quote:

Prison

232 posted on 06/14/2008 6:58:56 AM PDT by fightinJAG (RUSH: McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton longer than we've been in Iraq, and never gave up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
The words "habeas corpus" mean "produce the body." What that means in practice is an inmate files a claim that he must be freed because . . . fill in the blank.

Please see #232 .

233 posted on 06/14/2008 7:04:28 AM PDT by fightinJAG (RUSH: McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton longer than we've been in Iraq, and never gave up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: sasafras
McCain he will destroy what is left of the moral and conservative conscience of our country.

Don't be an idiot

McCain isn't that powerful

for years he has pushed for and supported liberal judges...

No, he supported moderate judges, the ones that would pass a Senate confirmation. Conservative judges would not.

Stop the propaganda, you are coming off as a troll

234 posted on 06/14/2008 7:18:48 AM PDT by Popman (Obama is like a Ken doll, smooth between the legs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Popman

“Stop the propaganda, you are coming off as a troll”

The only troll here sounds like you - McCainiacs like yourself need to realize the FR is not a place where idiots reside. McCain spearheaded the gang of 14 and with Kennedy almost destroyed this country with the passing of the “comprhensive” immigration reform. McCain will soon be speaking to LaRaza, an openly hispanic racist organization, why dont ya come on back and post after he opens his filthy racist mouth at that convention.


235 posted on 06/14/2008 7:40:56 AM PDT by sasafras (Obama is stupid, an idiot and confused, McCain is EVIL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: sasafras
You're a moron, I'm not a McCain supporter. Far from it.

The ONLY reason I plan to vote for him is the simple fact not voting for him is a vote for Obama. Voting for McCain will be painful and difficult, but watching Obama win the general election and really see the country flushed down the socialist toilet is too much to bear. Posting for years he has pushed for and supported liberal judges is simply not true. All you have to do is look at the record.

McCainiacs like yourself need to realize the FR is not a place where idiots reside.

You can lecture me on about FR when you pass your ten year anniversary of posting. This place is full of idiots, morons, ignorant wanna be's and DU trolls. Thanks for proving my point

236 posted on 06/14/2008 8:15:38 AM PDT by Popman (Obama is like a Ken doll, smooth between the legs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Popman

I think this is the issue.

There are people here that actually like McCain, There are people here that do not like him but will vote for him to keep Obama out. And there are people here that cannot vote for him no matter what.

What is troubling is that some people like McCain but don’t understand his reality (not bright) and some people want to cut off criticism because it means Obama.

Sorry but many of us rebel against the latter.


237 posted on 06/14/2008 10:16:31 AM PDT by Sunnyflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Sunnyflorida
What is troubling is that some people like McCain but don’t understand his reality (not bright) and some people want to cut off criticism because it means Obama.

I have no problem criticizing McCain over the issues he is wrong on, which are many, and I have criticized him plenty, but for poster to post such nonsense as

McCain he will destroy what is left of the moral and conservative conscience of our country.

for years he has pushed for and supported liberal judges...

These things simply are not true which tells me the poster is either a irrational McCain hater or an Obama plant.

Then when he gets called on it, and calls me an McCainiac for pointing out his lie, sorry, but the truth about McCain is ugly enough, we don't have to make crap up out of thin air to suppress his vote

McCain as POTUS is odious, Obama as POTUS is unthinkable.

It will be one or the other as much as we don't like the choice

238 posted on 06/14/2008 11:01:25 AM PDT by Popman (Obama is like a Ken doll, smooth between the legs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

To suggest that President Bush does not have a spine is ludicrous, in view of his incredible determination to prosecute the GWOT against constant opposition.


239 posted on 06/14/2008 11:48:57 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: karnage

Okay, then let’s see if he caves to the men in black.


240 posted on 06/14/2008 11:53:55 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson