Skip to comments.
Marine jailed in Fallujah case [Sgt. Ryan Weemer--second Marine jailed]
North County Times ^
| June 12, 2008
Posted on 06/13/2008 9:13:08 AM PDT by RedRover
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
06/13/2008 9:13:08 AM PDT
by
RedRover
To: RedRover
Rather than a bulwark against “hasty, malicious and oppressive prosecution,” today’s federal grand jury is a rubber stamp, leading many to agree that “a good prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.” Rep. Henry Hyde (R-IL)
Hyde was right then, and this case demonstrates he’s still correct.
2
posted on
06/13/2008 9:15:01 AM PDT
by
mgc1122
To: RedRover
On what legal bases does this clown of a judge claim jurisdiction. Clown should be impeached.
3
posted on
06/13/2008 9:15:05 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
To: 4woodenboats; American Cabalist; AmericanYankee; AndrewWalden; Antoninus; AliVeritas; ardara; ...
4
posted on
06/13/2008 9:15:11 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: RedRover
Hope Sgt. Weemer holds out like Sgt. Nelson did, legal or not this judge is out of line.
5
posted on
06/13/2008 9:24:33 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: jazusamo
This is ridiculous. This is what all soldiers, Marines and fighting personnel are going to be held on now that those same combatants are given constitutional rights. A buddy of mine says he is not going to be looking for “intelligence” assests anymore....they are all going to die. So at some point he will probably be dragged in the muck for his actions by those interepting them as illegal because he was a player in an “illegal” war
6
posted on
06/13/2008 9:29:12 AM PDT
by
killermedic
(Stop playing goal keeper and read for yourself)
To: MNJohnnie
MEJA - military extraterratorial jurisdiction act.
7
posted on
06/13/2008 9:33:13 AM PDT
by
jude24
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: RedRover; jazusamo; xzins; Girlene; Lancey Howard; Marine_Uncle
For reference:
PIO - United States Courts for the Ninth Circuit
Judge Larson was among several candidates recommended to the president by a local judicial nominations subcommittee created in 2001 as a compromise between the Bush administration and the state's two Democratic senators. A candidate must get four votes from the six-member committee to be considered.
A native of Fontana, Calif., Judge Larson received his B.S. in Foreign Service from Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in 1986, and his J.D. from the University of Southern California Law School in 1989. While at Georgetown, he served as a teaching assistant to Madeleine Albright, who would become secretary of state in President Clintons cabinet.
While the main problem in our military remains with the Generals and their staffs in DoD, the parasitic lawyers and judges never met an idea that they knew they were not qualified to comprehend.
8
posted on
06/13/2008 9:33:29 AM PDT
by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: killermedic
Being able to prosecute military in federal courts is pathetic, the law should never have been changed to allow it. With no statute of limitations on murder a service member could be prosecuted years later at the whim of a disgruntled fellow service member.
9
posted on
06/13/2008 9:34:24 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: MNJohnnie
That's an excellent question about jurisdiction.
Nazario is out of the Corps and was charged in federal court under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act.
Weemer also got out of the Corps but was recalled so he'd be subject to the UCMJ. But now he's in a federal jail anyway.
What's the point of the UCMJ if military members are also subject to the federal legal system for actions in combat?
10
posted on
06/13/2008 9:47:29 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: killermedic
"This is what all soldiers, Marines and fighting personnel are going to be held on now that those same combatants are given constitutional rights. A buddy of mine says he is not going to be looking for intelligence assests anymore....they are all going to die." Yup! That's what that ruling says to me - Take NO prisoners, ever! No exceptions. Problem solved.
To: jude24
What crummy law. Utterly no justification for it.
12
posted on
06/13/2008 9:51:24 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
To: jude24
Doesn’t seem a little screwy that a service member could be charged under two legal systems?
13
posted on
06/13/2008 9:52:58 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: RedRover; MNJohnnie; jude24
It would seem when this act was passed it was only supposed to cover civilians but that changed in a hurry.
Untested Law Key in Iraqi Abuse Scandal
It would apply only to crimes committed abroad that carry at least a one-year prison term. It would affect only civilians working for or connected to the Defense Department.
So much for intended laws!
14
posted on
06/13/2008 9:59:02 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: RedRover
The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars to be treated and appreciated by their nation.George Washington.
15
posted on
06/13/2008 10:03:05 AM PDT
by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: jackibutterfly
Problem solved.No, not all. In fact, that is what the Fallujah case is all about. Marines allegedly killed insurgent prisoners. Worst case for the Marines, life in prison. Best case, a ruined life.
So much for the thanks of a grateful nation.
16
posted on
06/13/2008 10:07:04 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: RedRover
To my knowledge, MEJA has only been applied to servicemen who had been discharged before the investigation commenced. In those cases, there is no UCMJ jurisdiction.
17
posted on
06/13/2008 10:15:15 AM PDT
by
jude24
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: jude24
Then Sgt Weemer could be first.
The article isn’t rich with detail but a federal judge found him in contempt of a grand jury and he now sits in the county lockup—not in the stockade.
And like Sgt Nelson, he could also be charged with unauthorized leave under the UCMJ for his time in jail.
18
posted on
06/13/2008 10:21:20 AM PDT
by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: Grizzled Bear
Outstanding quote!! Unfortunately, or rather tragically, the perfect accompaniment to Boumediene v. Bush is a program of war crime trials.
19
posted on
06/13/2008 10:24:23 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
(Kaffur and proud of it.)
To: RedRover
Well, not necessarily.
SGT Weemer is charged with contempt of court in a civilian court. He is a subpeonaed witness there, and his refusal to answer questions there subjects him to liability. The UCMJ doesn't have any immediate jurisdiction over that offense (Article 132 could be used, but that's not really an appropriate use of that) - but Weemer isn't charged under MEJA. Stand corrected.
20
posted on
06/13/2008 10:26:51 AM PDT
by
jude24
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson