Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marine jailed in Fallujah case [Sgt. Ryan Weemer--second Marine jailed]
North County Times ^ | June 12, 2008

Posted on 06/13/2008 9:13:08 AM PDT by RedRover

RIVERSIDE ---- A second Marine has been found in contempt of court for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury and has been ordered to jail.

Sgt. Ryan G. Weemer, charged with murder in the death of an Iraqi detainee in Fallujah in 2004, appeared in uniform before U.S. District Court Judge Stephen Larson on Thursday and was ordered into custody after a brief hearing Thursday.

Weemer can be held for up to 18 months unless he decides to testify before the grand jury.

The jury is investigating Weemer's former squad leader, Jose Nazario, who is no longer in the Marine Corps. Nazario is charged with voluntary manslaughter in the killing of two Iraqi captives during fighting in Fallujah in November 2004. He has pleaded not guilty.

Last month, a third defendant in the case, Sgt. Jermaine Nelson, spent a week in jail when he refused to answer the grand jury's questions. A judge freed him after he agreed to appear before the panel next week and at least hear the questions that jurors may ask.

Like Weemer, Nelson is charged with one count of unpremeditated murder. Investigative hearings for the two Marines to decide whether their charges will stand will take place at Camp Pendleton later this year.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fallujah; usmc; weemer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
The previous story, regarding Sgt Jermaine Nelson, is here: Marine Jailed by Federal Judge for Refusing to Testify Against Brother Marine.
1 posted on 06/13/2008 9:13:08 AM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Rather than a bulwark against “hasty, malicious and oppressive prosecution,” today’s federal grand jury is a rubber stamp, leading many to agree that “a good prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.” Rep. Henry Hyde (R-IL)

Hyde was right then, and this case demonstrates he’s still correct.


2 posted on 06/13/2008 9:15:01 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

On what legal bases does this clown of a judge claim jurisdiction. Clown should be impeached.


3 posted on 06/13/2008 9:15:05 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4woodenboats; American Cabalist; AmericanYankee; AndrewWalden; Antoninus; AliVeritas; ardara; ...

4 posted on 06/13/2008 9:15:11 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Hope Sgt. Weemer holds out like Sgt. Nelson did, legal or not this judge is out of line.


5 posted on 06/13/2008 9:24:33 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This is ridiculous. This is what all soldiers, Marines and fighting personnel are going to be held on now that those same combatants are given constitutional rights. A buddy of mine says he is not going to be looking for “intelligence” assests anymore....they are all going to die. So at some point he will probably be dragged in the muck for his actions by those interepting them as illegal because he was a player in an “illegal” war


6 posted on 06/13/2008 9:29:12 AM PDT by killermedic (Stop playing goal keeper and read for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

MEJA - military extraterratorial jurisdiction act.


7 posted on 06/13/2008 9:33:13 AM PDT by jude24 (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; jazusamo; xzins; Girlene; Lancey Howard; Marine_Uncle
For reference:

While the main problem in our military remains with the Generals and their staffs in DoD, the parasitic lawyers and judges never met an idea that they knew they were not qualified to comprehend.

8 posted on 06/13/2008 9:33:29 AM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: killermedic

Being able to prosecute military in federal courts is pathetic, the law should never have been changed to allow it. With no statute of limitations on murder a service member could be prosecuted years later at the whim of a disgruntled fellow service member.


9 posted on 06/13/2008 9:34:24 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
That's an excellent question about jurisdiction.

Nazario is out of the Corps and was charged in federal court under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act.

Weemer also got out of the Corps but was recalled so he'd be subject to the UCMJ. But now he's in a federal jail anyway.

What's the point of the UCMJ if military members are also subject to the federal legal system for actions in combat?

10 posted on 06/13/2008 9:47:29 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: killermedic
"This is what all soldiers, Marines and fighting personnel are going to be held on now that those same combatants are given constitutional rights. A buddy of mine says he is not going to be looking for “intelligence” assests anymore....they are all going to die."

Yup! That's what that ruling says to me - Take NO prisoners, ever! No exceptions. Problem solved.

11 posted on 06/13/2008 9:51:03 AM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jude24

What crummy law. Utterly no justification for it.


12 posted on 06/13/2008 9:51:24 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Doesn’t seem a little screwy that a service member could be charged under two legal systems?


13 posted on 06/13/2008 9:52:58 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; MNJohnnie; jude24
It would seem when this act was passed it was only supposed to cover civilians but that changed in a hurry.

Untested Law Key in Iraqi Abuse Scandal

It would apply only to crimes committed abroad that carry at least a one-year prison term. It would affect only civilians working for or connected to the Defense Department.

So much for intended laws!

14 posted on 06/13/2008 9:59:02 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

“The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars to be treated and appreciated by their nation.”—George Washington.


15 posted on 06/13/2008 10:03:05 AM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackibutterfly
Problem solved.

No, not all. In fact, that is what the Fallujah case is all about. Marines allegedly killed insurgent prisoners. Worst case for the Marines, life in prison. Best case, a ruined life.

So much for the thanks of a grateful nation.

16 posted on 06/13/2008 10:07:04 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

To my knowledge, MEJA has only been applied to servicemen who had been discharged before the investigation commenced. In those cases, there is no UCMJ jurisdiction.


17 posted on 06/13/2008 10:15:15 AM PDT by jude24 (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Then Sgt Weemer could be first.

The article isn’t rich with detail but a federal judge found him in contempt of a grand jury and he now sits in the county lockup—not in the stockade.

And like Sgt Nelson, he could also be charged with unauthorized leave under the UCMJ for his time in jail.


18 posted on 06/13/2008 10:21:20 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
Outstanding quote!! Unfortunately, or rather tragically, the perfect accompaniment to Boumediene v. Bush is a program of war crime trials.
19 posted on 06/13/2008 10:24:23 AM PDT by JimSEA (Kaffur and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Well, not necessarily.

SGT Weemer is charged with contempt of court in a civilian court. He is a subpeonaed witness there, and his refusal to answer questions there subjects him to liability. The UCMJ doesn't have any immediate jurisdiction over that offense (Article 132 could be used, but that's not really an appropriate use of that) - but Weemer isn't charged under MEJA. Stand corrected.

20 posted on 06/13/2008 10:26:51 AM PDT by jude24 (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson