Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon

Do tell. That ain’t no forty-six year-old artifact.

The fact that appears to be stamped “JUN 6 2007” on the reverse does not help matters any.


11 posted on 06/12/2008 3:23:03 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: sinanju

The word LASER on the lower left also indicates it is not original. The first working LASER wasn’t operational until 1960 and even then in a lab with no printing applications even dreamed of by 1961.


56 posted on 06/12/2008 3:48:15 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: sinanju
Do tell. That ain’t no forty-six year-old artifact.

The fact that appears to be stamped “JUN 6 2007” on the reverse does not help matters any.

If you requested a copy of your birth certificate and it was processed tomorrow, your copy would be stamped JUN 13, 2008.

You can't get the original copy of your birth certificate, it was filed with the state and will stay there. Any subsequent copy of the birth certificate is going to be issued in the format of choice at the time. Once, that was a photostat (identifiable as a reverse image, recognizable as white printing on a black background). Then, it was a xerographic copy -- duly certified. Now it is a computer-generated piece of paper.

72 posted on 06/12/2008 3:55:15 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson