Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant; All

There are two ways that one can be born as an American citizen. Jus Solis is the first. This is Latin for Law of Soil. Essentially, if you are born on American soil, you are a US citizen. the second way that one can be born as a US citizen is if either of your parents is a US citizen. This is known as Jus Sanguinis. That is LAtin for Law of Blood.

Whether Dumbo was born in the USA or not is irrelevent. His mother was a US citizen and therefore so is he.


55 posted on 06/12/2008 12:58:25 PM PDT by stefanbatory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stefanbatory

I learned that in my high school government class...in a private school many moons ago, btw


58 posted on 06/12/2008 1:00:05 PM PDT by stefanbatory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: stefanbatory

Not true, depending on the circumstances.


63 posted on 06/12/2008 1:01:37 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: stefanbatory
If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.

FindLaw

And we don't know if his mother met this criteria

92 posted on 06/12/2008 1:24:17 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: stefanbatory

“His mother was a US citizen and therefore so is he.”

Dangit, THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE. The issue is “Does he qualify as a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AS THAT TERM WAS DEFINED WHEN HE WAS BORN.” Different standard, at least then. The reasoning behind the law was because one parent wasn’t a US citizen and the other hadn’t been for 5 years, he was just as much a citizen of both countries and could choose at majority. (They didn’t allow dual citizenship as much then.) Therefore, he qualifies as a NATURALIZED citizen, not a NATURAL BORN citizen. The ONLY real difference between the two is one is eligible for President, the other is NOT.

I’d cite the statute, but it’s been cited time and again already, and apparently people aren’t bothering to read it. They prefer what they “know” vs. what the specific applicable statute said at the time.

Why is this so d@mn hard for people to grasp?!?!!! Unfreakingbelievable.


123 posted on 06/12/2008 1:45:00 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson