To: NonValueAdded
Did Congress pin its hopes on a technology not ready for prime time and by pushing a choice without market support, impede development of a better solution?
I have been thinking the same thing. Great point.
12 posted on
06/11/2008 7:25:45 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
To: PA Engineer
16 posted on
06/11/2008 7:32:30 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(I tried to explain that I meant it as a compliment, but that only appears to have made things worse.)
To: PA Engineer
Another example would be a rational Congress person.
To: PA Engineer
LED's are the future of lighting. Squirrely bulbs are a transitional temporary solution.
To: PA Engineer; NonValueAdded
Is it even a proper and Constitutional function of Congress to get involved in such things? Wouldn’t a better solution be to just GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY and obey the Constitution? Especially look up the Tenth Amendment... If there is no specific grant of authority, then there is NO authority. How hard would it be for our congresscritters to realize this simple fact?
34 posted on
06/11/2008 8:03:25 PM PDT by
dcwusmc
(We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson