Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head

Semantics is the culprit here? Or was it just a bad choice of words. I may just be a country boy, but I do know one thing and that is: WORDS MEAN SOMETHING. I recognize that an organized effort can do more than squad, platoon,company or battalion can when being combative to a selected enemy, and Obama is my enemy. I have participated in two wars against collectivism, whether called Communism, Marxism, or whatever the Democrats are calling it nowadays. Perhaps they are calling it “progressive” because they don’t want to be referred to as “liberal”: Certainly they don’t want to be called “commies”, but thats what they are. In any case, anything that causes Obama not to be elected HAS MY VOTE! If he is elected, this wonderful nation of ours is in for a world of hurt. But then, American voters are dumber than a box of rocks...just look at the legislature and see the wonderful specimens there, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, Feinstein, Feingold.... there are a hundred more left leaners (Commies) that are elected, and re-elected... so,.... knowing that the media has declared Obama the “messiah” (note the non cap m), and they control what is said about candidates (do you think they want to give up all of that advertising revenue by being critical of their “chosen one?” Do you really think that what is published on FreeRepublic is going to have ANY effect on the general public?? Where is Joe McCarthy when you need him?


18 posted on 06/11/2008 7:13:29 PM PDT by Invictus (Can't see out of one eye, and can't hear out of the other... In this upcoming election, that is GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Invictus
Semantics was the culrpit between you and me. I certainly in no way meant socialism, communism, marxism or anything like that in my use of the word above when indicating that our combined efforts to educate people could be assitied by this banner and web site.

Words do mean something and our efforts, working as individuals for the same goals is simply all I meant...which fits one of the definitions of that word which is: "Expressing a collection or aggregate of individuals, by a singular form" - Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

I certainly did not mean to offend or imply anything else.

Now, as to the people like Obama and others who lean toward the socialistic, marxistic, communistic definition and use of that word, we are certainly united in our efforts against them.

If it will suite you and allow us to get past the particular definition...let us use "combined" or "united" in its place because that is certainly what was meant.

19 posted on 06/11/2008 8:28:08 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Invictus
As to having any impacy...yes, I believe it can.

It did in Klamath Falls, OR, it did in Jarbiudge, NV, it did regarding the fake WTC Flag Raising, it did in the earlier immigration battle...and it can here too. It just requires enough people taking it and running with it and getting their friends, relatives, and neighbors within their sphere of influence to do the same, and so on and so forth.

We have great power of we all network unitedly to spread the word and get other, serious minded, dedicated Americans to take note and do the same.

20 posted on 06/11/2008 8:32:17 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson