Posted on 06/11/2008 11:04:40 AM PDT by OnRightOnLeftCoast
There is a stretch of North Glebe Road, in Arlington, Virginia, that epitomizes the American approach to road safety. Its a sloping curve, beginning on a four-lane divided highway and running down to Chain Bridge, on the Potomac River. Most drivers, absent a speed limit, would probably take the curve at 30 or 35 mph in good weather. But it has a 25-mph speed limit, vigorously enforced. As you approach the curve, a sign with flashing lights suggests slowing further, to 15 mph. A little later, another sign makes the same suggestion. Great! the neighborhoods more cautious residents might think. Were being protected. But I believe policies like this in fact make us all less safe.
(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...
This guy must be bored and annoyed the most with the cheap gas prices here compared to what he pays in his beloved homeland.
I do not really see a problem with traffic enforcement on truly dangerous roads. I think any sort of enforcement should be done without any sort of police traps. Cops should be out in the open so that people see them and slow down. Anyone who gets a ticket in such a scenario only has themselves to blame.
What I like most about driving in Britain are the round-abouts. We have very few here in Southern Cal.
That’s not what he’s describing. They build a road that’s saft to drive at 30 and then set the speed limit to 15. It’s an invitation to “speed”. And what’s worse it makes the road more dangerous.
This guy is right on. We don’t always enforce traffic for safety, but also for revenue. We have stop signs that exist for no reason other than to regulate traffic flow which is BS. We have speed traps that nail people to to raise money rather than to preserve safety.
Look at all the stop signs in a parking lot next time you are in wal-mart or what not. And you *don’t* even have to stop at those.
ping
Even in such a situation, it is almost always the driver's fault if he or she speeds. I routinely drive fast on roads where the posted speed limit is 30mph but could easily allow for faster speeds. I haven't been ticketed, but if I am, it doesn't matter what the design speed of the road is.
The times when a cop does tail me, I just set the cruise control to 30mph and watch as the "parade" backs down behind me.
You guys in SoCal have those stop lights *on* the entrance ramps to highways, er, the freeways...
Maybe he picked a bad example but I could point out 50 good ones within 20 miles of here.
In MN,(where you’re from), too fast for conditions is defined as any speed that caused you to leave the road. In the winter, that could be less than 5 mph.
To say that we would be safer without stop signs is like saying we would be safer without seat-belts. It is demonstrably false.
That’s true.
If police make a point of always being in the open, then no visible police = no police. Choose your speed accordingly.
While the possibility of a trap creates uncertainty. There may or may not be police. Choose your speed accordingly.
I'd argue that the uncertainty of a police presence encourages greater compliance without needing a larger presence.
My town, Sedona AZ, is experimenting with roundabouts in a major way. Nine of them are being built to replace major intersections that once had signals. One of the first to be completed, several months ago, is right outside my complex. The big advantage: the roundabout is much quieter than the old signalized intersection at night, when most traffic just glides right through. The big disadvantage: the roundabout is noisier by day, when there is a constant chorus of honking as local drivers tangle with tourists who are clueless on how roundabouts work.
I know this because I’m a Yooper.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.