Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport; patton
The CPS has broad statutory immunity, and a plaintiff would almost have to prove the CPS acted intentionally in bad faith with no basis at all to believe kids were at risk. I think a suit against the CPS, if filed, will fail, and I would frankly be surprised to see such a suit filed because of the intense scrutiny which would be placed upon the internal workings of the flds sect.

Having said that, I think patton raises a decent point on the issue of adult women being taken into custody as minors. Such a person may have a cause of action. Even if the substantial immunity issues could be overcome, I don't think anybody would get rich from what an average West Texas jury would award insuch a case.

187 posted on 06/11/2008 12:41:20 PM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: San Jacinto

I won’t speculate on possible awards, but I would bet that there is a lawyer in TX who would take the case of the detained 37-yo on a contingency basis.

More than one lawyer, probably.


192 posted on 06/11/2008 1:32:33 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

To: San Jacinto

I think a suit against the CPS, if filed, will fail, and I would frankly be surprised to see such a suit filed because of the intense scrutiny which would be placed upon the internal workings of the flds sect.


I tend to agree that the FLDS doesn’t want the scrutiny that they will receive if they take this to a civil jury for damages. However that said if and when any criminal charges are brought and trials held then they will get tons of internal exposure so at that time another trial in the civil courts may not produce that much additional exposure.

I would guess the plantiff lawyers are lined up trying to get them into a civil actions so they can get their 40% or so cut of any awards. Also I agree I don’t think you’ll find a Texas jury that will agree in the required number to award any large sums. I know it’s not unaminous but don’t know the number that needs to agree in order to find for the plaintiff.

Some have speculated it will be in the Federal courts that this action will occur so as to take it out of the state court system. If that occurs then it would still have to be moved out of state to get it away from a Texas jury.

Time will tell as we are far from this event being over.


201 posted on 06/11/2008 1:56:58 PM PDT by deport ( ----Cue Spooky Music---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson