[commonguymd]

So you are saying that they shouldn’t have the right to vote? Oh okay.

Come on now, just the other day you were doing some serious mental gymnastics trying to allude that someone in the compound contacted a known and convicted hoaxer, encouraging that hoaxer to make phone calls to a shelter so that the shelter could contact authorities and thus involve CPS. Don’t you get worn out sometimes with the utter fascinating brain flexibility?

[UCANSEE2]

“So you are saying that they shouldn’t have the right to vote? Oh okay.”

I didn’t say that at all. You made it up, out of thin air, and then answered the question yourself.

I was pointing out that they wanted no involvement with ‘the law’, nor politics, and now, since the ‘raid’, they suddenly decided they needed to be patriotic.

I was only questioning why the sudden change of heart.

Why had they waited until ‘now’ to exercise their right? EN MASSE.

[UCANSEE2]

“Come on now, just the other day you were doing some serious mental gymnastics trying to allude that someone...”

---

Why yes. Glad you read it. I made it very, very clear that we were just speculating, and the issue was the various ways it was possible for Swinton to get inside information.

I even made it clear that none of those options were proveable, at the moment, and they meant ‘nothing’, and that they were far-fetched.

---

But, as clear as I was, It seems you want to take it out of context, and say I was using it to ‘prove’ the allegations in this case.

You are trying too hard, trying to dismiss something I wasn’t trying to prove.

[FastCoyote]

“So you are saying that they shouldn’t have the right to vote? Oh okay.”

So, if the mafia moved en mass into your district, and rigged the judges and juries and police, you would be fine with that? Oh yes, you are quite the patriot.