Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nev. rancher awarded $4.2M for 'taken' water right ( Sagebrush Rebellion )
Associated Press ^ | Jun. 10, 2008 | SCOTT SONNER

Posted on 06/10/2008 9:59:35 PM PDT by george76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: george76

Bump for the sane judge that heard the case.


21 posted on 06/11/2008 8:31:27 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I’m a proud member of the Sagebrush Rebellion since 1978.

I still think the Intermountain West should abdicate bump.


22 posted on 06/11/2008 8:35:48 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; marsh2; Grampa Dave

Sadly, the “war on the west” continues unabated...


23 posted on 06/11/2008 9:17:57 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Liberalism's prime directives are: taxation, regulation, litigation, legislation, agravation, etc..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
"This is great news to ranchers..."

I'm not so sure. The 4.2 million is a small fraction of the real damages, so perhaps the judge has pulled an inverse Solomon on them. If the heirs decide to take the money and shut up, the case is over, and the pittance will set precedent, and make the next case likely to get even less.

24 posted on 06/11/2008 9:23:24 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American History)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

This will just continue to get worse until the faceless beaucratic are made to be responsible from their own financial well-being. The response is always that people wouldn’t take the government jobs if their personal fortunes were at stake. And the response to that is, “What’s your point?”


25 posted on 06/11/2008 9:28:09 AM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: george76

From Liberty Matters:
Epic Victory for Hage Family
After 17 years in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Wayne and Jean Hage’s takings case has been decided – and it is a great victory for private property rights in America!

The Hages claimed that the federal government (U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management) had taken their western ranch, a combination of private base property and federal grazing allotments, through physical and regulatory takings. It is a landmark case because it is the first of its kind to achieve clarity as to what property rights ranchers own on federal grazing allotments and clarifies that if certain property rights are taken through grazing and environmental regulations, the government must pay just compensation.

The court decided that the Hages owned the water rights, ditch rights of ways, and the range improvements on the federal lands. It also found that although the government has the right to authorize and cancel grazing permits, it does not have the right to prevent the ranchers from accessing their water rights on federal lands. The court ruled that a regulatory and physical taking occurred and, therefore, the government owes the estates of Wayne and Jean Hage just compensation, interest for the 17 years, and attorney’s fees.

Stewards of the Range, a membership driven, non-profit organization, assisted the Hage case with funding. “Without the Stewards members, this landmark decision would not be written in case law,” stated Margaret Byfield, executive director of Stewards. “The critical precedent and deterrent is now set that when land management agencies attempt to regulate away private property, they risk invoking a taking for which they must pay just compensation under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution.”

I have been a proud member of the Sagebrush Rebellion/Win Back the West movement since 1990.


26 posted on 06/11/2008 9:44:04 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Will the government appeal the jury’s decision? Also... why did it take 17 years for this decision?


27 posted on 06/11/2008 10:11:38 AM PDT by John123 (Obama said that he has been in 57 states. I will now light myself on fire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Velveeta; DAVEY CROCKETT

At last, something for the right side.


28 posted on 06/11/2008 8:30:16 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1990507/posts?page=451 SURVIVAL, RECIPES, GARDENS, & INFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson