Replies

UCANSEE2 said: "However, there is no provision in the statute for taking all the children, in this situation, only the pubescent females."

Are you confusing the dissenting Texas Supreme Court opinion with that of the majority? The rulings of the Appeals Court and the Texas Supreme Court were that there was insufficient evidence to take ANY of the children who were the subject of the appeal. Judge Walther recognized that this decision applied to ALL the children since the evidence was the same for all of them.

“Are you confusing the dissenting Texas Supreme Court opinion with that of the majority? “

If you go back and read those posts, you can see that is what I was debating. Considering all the opinions given by the Judges, and not just the ones you agree with.

To do so is blind democracy. That is so many are asking for, and don’t see it.

Blind democracy. Majority rules, no matter what. Anybody that disagrees will be thrown out.

My remark you asked about says ‘in this situation’.
The principle of it being child-brides.
The majority opinion said there wasn’t sufficient evidence of ‘imminent danger’ to even the pubescent under-legal-age females, as it might be a year or so before they reached menstruation and were considered up for auction on the Prophet hotline to God.

So they thought that the CPS and LE would have time to conduct further investigation, and should have found a way to leave the kiddies there. But under supervision.