Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
McCain was not speaking of shareholders. He was using the collective we. I can't understand why conservatives would support even one more increment of the already stifling regulations on private business.
37 posted on 06/10/2008 5:58:59 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: DManA
McCain was not speaking of shareholders.

I believe he was. Did you read the article?

"And under my reforms, all aspects of a CEO's pay, including any severance arrangements, must be approved by shareholders"

I can't understand why conservatives would support even one more increment of the already stifling regulations on private business.

Corporations are not private businesses, they are public businesses. No one forced these companies to incorporate and sell their stock on the open market. Once they do that, however, they are subject to regulation by the entity which recognizes their corporate status, i.e., the government.

If these companies can't live under the regulations placed upon them by virtue of the corporate status, then they can always reorganize as some non-corporate entity.

43 posted on 06/10/2008 6:09:27 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson