Skip to comments.
Ron Paul is Dr. No?
June 9, 2009
Posted on 06/09/2008 5:19:23 PM PDT by Dog Gone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
He's the "taxpayer's best friend"?
1
posted on
06/09/2008 5:19:23 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Says the National Taxpayers Union.
2
posted on
06/09/2008 5:22:31 PM PDT
by
BGHater
("Save water, shower with a friend")
To: Dog Gone
You forgot all the subsidies to shrimpers.
3
posted on
06/09/2008 5:24:00 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(McCain for President, 2008)
To: Dog Gone
You know, a two year old can say “no!” And more consistently, too.
4
posted on
06/09/2008 5:26:32 PM PDT
by
hocndoc
(http://www.LifeEthics.org (I have a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
To: Dog Gone
Fact is Ron Paul is just another King Pork.
5
posted on
06/09/2008 5:28:57 PM PDT
by
Norman Bates
(Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
To: hocndoc
$25,000 to install security cameras at Fox Run Apartments in VictoriaYet he voted against awarding a posthumous Congressional medal to the creator of the Peanuts comic strip.
I'm still trying to figure that one out.
6
posted on
06/09/2008 5:30:59 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Shrimp boats is a-comin’ Their sails are in sight
Shrimp boats is a-comin’ There’s dancin’ tonight
***
Shrimp boats is a-comin’ Their pork is in sight
Shrimp boats is a-comin’ There’s doping tonight
7
posted on
06/09/2008 5:31:20 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(McCain will send a self-abused stomped elephant to the DRNC.)
To: Norman Bates
Ron Paul IS against all earmarks because he feels they are unconstitutional, except the ones he wants. Those are perfectly constitutional, and ok.
8
posted on
06/09/2008 5:35:31 PM PDT
by
John D
To: John D
Care to place a bet on how he’ll vote on legislation to eliminate them if he gets the chance?
9
posted on
06/09/2008 5:37:35 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Dog Gone
Help me out here. $5,000,000.00 for a sunken
ship?
If that doesn't define government waste, nothing does.
10
posted on
06/09/2008 5:38:47 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
11
posted on
06/09/2008 5:42:15 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: 1rudeboy
A total canard. An “earmark” is not a spending increase. None of the above are actual spending votes. The best measure of spending votes is by the National Taxpayers Union and Paul consistently ranks on its honor roll as one of the best....certainly ahead of McCrazy.
To: Dog Gone
Son of a gun. I don't see anything on their for drainage in Alvin. Guess we're on our own.
He is such a arrogant phony.
13
posted on
06/09/2008 5:47:09 PM PDT
by
Texas Mom
(Two places you're always welcome. Church and Grandma's house.)
To: Perdogg

RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!RON PAUL!!!
I love this guy and his followers. Very comical lot.
To: Dog Gone
Earmarks in my district? Much deserved economic stimulus.
Earmarks in your district? Pork barrel politics of the worst possible type.
It always seems to depend on whose ox is being gored.
To: Dog Gone
He’s a politician.
What do you expect???
Just because a bunch of pseudo-libertarian weed-smoking Troofer nutballs built a Web-based cult around him doesn’t make him better...
16
posted on
06/09/2008 5:52:07 PM PDT
by
El Conservador
("Liberalism is the application of childish emotion to complex issues." - MrB)
To: Captain Kirk
I’ve clocked your spin at 20 MHz...
17
posted on
06/09/2008 5:53:23 PM PDT
by
El Conservador
("Liberalism is the application of childish emotion to complex issues." - MrB)
To: Dog Gone
Santa Rosa, California, where Charles Schultz lived, is not in Ron Paul’s district. Victoria, Texas, is in his district.
To: Captain Kirk
A total canard. An earmark is not a spending increase. None of the above are actual spending votes. The best measure of spending votes is by the National Taxpayers Union and Paul consistently ranks on its honor roll as one of the best....certainly ahead of McCrazy.He's apparently the "King of earmarks", but nobody's willing to put up a dime that he'd vote against eliminating them. Imagine that.
19
posted on
06/09/2008 5:57:53 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Wallace T.
Santa Rosa, California, where Charles Schultz lived, is not in Ron Pauls district. Victoria, Texas, is in his district.I see. A $25 medal for Charles Schulz would be a waste of taxpayer money, but $25,000 for an apartment complex security camera system in his district is a fine use of funds from American taxpayers from all districts.
Got it.
20
posted on
06/09/2008 6:05:06 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson