Well, you are right. It is 2002, and it’s a retread.
But was that all that long ago? It has been evident to the dullest eye since at least the 1980s that the ACLU is more interested in supporting abortion and atheism than individual rights and freedoms.
They might take on a token Nazi or two as clients, just to show that they support constitutional rights for everyone, even the worst of us. But I don’t notice them coming to the rescue of parents who want their kids to get a decent moral education in our public schools, or pro-lifers arrested for praying on public sidewalks and beaten by the police in the process.
No one who claims to be for family or life could POSSIBLY sit down with the ACLU. Maybe Barr has some explanation. Maybe he thought he could convince them to change their ways. But I haven’t heard it, and it doesn’t seem to be very evident here in this article.
“No one who claims to be for family or life could POSSIBLY sit down with the ACLU.”
Sure they can. If I honestly thought that sitting down with the ACLU would work to end infanticide, I’d sit down with them in a New York second.
“Maybe Barr has some explanation. Maybe he thought he could convince them to change their ways. But I haven’t heard it, and it doesn’t seem to be very evident here in this article.”
If he had an alterior motive, do you really think he’d be able to comment on it?