Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: harwood

The bottom line is that a nuclear fission weapon within the technological capabilities of all but the US and Russia is limited in weight to a minimum of between 1,000 and 1,500 lbs, and is the size of a large plastic trash dumpster.

However, this is not a practical weapon for ground delivery, as it would give off a significant radiation signature, which would be very obvious at our ports of entry.

The other alternative is a “radiation bomb”, that is radiological material blown into a cloud with high explosives. It does not create a nuclear reaction. But it has an inherent problem.

Light weight particles that would be carried great distances have short half-lives. Heavier particles fall to Earth quickly, limiting the area of contamination.

A dangerous particle that was created at Chernobyl was radioactive Iodine. Its half-life is two weeks. But from the moment of its creation, the clock was ticking. So if some terrorists got their hands on a quantity, they would have to use it almost immediately or it would be decayed and no longer radioactive.

But if they got a quantity of uranium or plutonium, it is so heavy that the vast majority would just be within a few feet of were the bomb had gone off.


70 posted on 06/06/2008 4:42:21 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
"...is limited in weight to a minimum of between 1,000 and 1,500 lbs, and is the size of a large plastic trash dumpster."

Oh. You mean about the same size as a small load of pot or cocaine brought in from the Bahamas, Mexico, or Cuba?

84 posted on 06/06/2008 8:47:07 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("Ah! but it was something to have at least a choice of nightmares.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson