Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/06/2008 2:42:58 PM PDT by harwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: harwood
There has been a lot of talk on various jihadi forums regarding a nuclear strike by AQ.

Whether it happens in the near future or distant future, courtesy of AQ (a.k.a. 'The Pig Suckers') or some other group, it's likely to happen. There was an episode of the McLaughlin Group (not that I'm a JM viewer anymore) about ten years back; all the conservatives present put the likelihood of nuclear terrorism against the US in the 90%+ range (IIRC), and all of the 'feel-good-liberals' put the likelihood close to zero. As usual, the 'iberals' were completely delusional. Bottom line: it's more difficult to protect a country this size than it is to sneak in a nuclear device, just once. Especially when the federal government is unlikely to say anything, if they stop an attempt at nuclear terrorism (or two, or three, or)...

33 posted on 06/06/2008 3:21:23 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood

if so,

watch the way the nuclear cloud moves,

and drive perpendicular.


36 posted on 06/06/2008 3:33:42 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood

Not again........


47 posted on 06/06/2008 3:50:57 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood

SSDD


53 posted on 06/06/2008 3:58:32 PM PDT by RightWhale (We see the polygons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood

I am sure if there is a threat, Bush will take care of it.


55 posted on 06/06/2008 4:01:28 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood
The US must have some back channels to the terrorists. They need to be told that, “if you bomb us we WILL bomb you...back to the stone age”!

These monkeys only understand one thing...brute force! They must be crushed at all cost.

58 posted on 06/06/2008 4:09:05 PM PDT by WellyP (How much does Huma know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood
Read More at 64.233.179.104
IP address Type Host name DNS state

72.14.207.99 A google.com Not OK (
64.233.187.99 )
64.233.167.99 A google.com OK
64.233.187.99 A google.com Not OK (
72.14.207.99 )
209.85.237.25 MX smtp1.google.com OK
64.233.167.25 MX smtp2.google.com OK
64.233.183.25 MX smtp3.google.com OK
72.14.215.25 MX smtp4.google.com OK
216.239.32.10 NS ns1.google.com OK
216.239.34.10 NS ns2.google.com OK
216.239.36.10 NS ns3.google.com OK
216.239.38.10 NS ns4.google.com OK

Google's gonna nuke us!
59 posted on 06/06/2008 4:14:05 PM PDT by Coffee200am
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood
bushs-fault
67 posted on 06/06/2008 4:31:42 PM PDT by redreno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood

Next Congress needs to start a program where each and every nation signs (voluntary) an agreement much like diplomatic agreements. Spelling out what goes and what don’t. (Reciprocately.) Most would be happy to co-operate. Get tough with those who talk tough.


68 posted on 06/06/2008 4:32:56 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood

The bottom line is that a nuclear fission weapon within the technological capabilities of all but the US and Russia is limited in weight to a minimum of between 1,000 and 1,500 lbs, and is the size of a large plastic trash dumpster.

However, this is not a practical weapon for ground delivery, as it would give off a significant radiation signature, which would be very obvious at our ports of entry.

The other alternative is a “radiation bomb”, that is radiological material blown into a cloud with high explosives. It does not create a nuclear reaction. But it has an inherent problem.

Light weight particles that would be carried great distances have short half-lives. Heavier particles fall to Earth quickly, limiting the area of contamination.

A dangerous particle that was created at Chernobyl was radioactive Iodine. Its half-life is two weeks. But from the moment of its creation, the clock was ticking. So if some terrorists got their hands on a quantity, they would have to use it almost immediately or it would be decayed and no longer radioactive.

But if they got a quantity of uranium or plutonium, it is so heavy that the vast majority would just be within a few feet of were the bomb had gone off.


70 posted on 06/06/2008 4:42:21 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood; Allegra; big'ol_freeper; Lil'freeper; TrueKnightGalahad; blackie; Larry Lucido; ...


76 posted on 06/06/2008 6:12:54 PM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harwood

An al-Queda Strike on is nearing; it is the elevation of the sixth Iman to the Presidency of the United States of America.


79 posted on 06/06/2008 6:27:52 PM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson