Skip to comments.
Beach bonfires may be banned (Seattle fights global warming)
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^
| June 6, 2008
| Kery Murakami
Posted on 06/06/2008 6:55:02 AM PDT by Junior_G
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Seattle's pissing contest with San Francisco to see which city can be the most idiotic continues unabated.
1
posted on
06/06/2008 6:55:03 AM PDT
by
Junior_G
To: Junior_G
Oh yeah it’s those beach bonfires,,,the kids should not be allowed to have any fun at all, they might get the idea that life is to be enjoyed. That does not fit in with Commie theory at all.
2
posted on
06/06/2008 6:56:55 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
To: Junior_G
the city plans to run public-service announcements and hand out brochures later this month about the effects of bonfires on global warming
/jawdrop
3
posted on
06/06/2008 6:57:21 AM PDT
by
freedomlover
(Make sure you're in love - before you move in the heavy stuff)
To: Junior_G
I have just changed my will. Instead of being buried in the cometary that is located on our property I have instructed the wife or kids to build a huge funeral pyre in the back yard out of used tractor tires and railroad ties.
That way when they light it off every environmentalist within twenty miles can see my huge black cloud on the horizon and b*tch about the damn idiot who is burning it.
4
posted on
06/06/2008 6:59:35 AM PDT
by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Junior_G
To: freedomlover
To: freedomlover
The only time Mayor Nickels is ever in the news is when he’s promoting a new “green” initiative. It seems like all of the city’s resources are being squandered on environmental efforts that aren’t going to change the weather patterns in Bangladesh, no matter how much these nutjobs wish it were so.
7
posted on
06/06/2008 7:00:10 AM PDT
by
Junior_G
To: Junior_G
But smoking pot is still OK.
8
posted on
06/06/2008 7:01:33 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Abathar
I love it. In my will, I’m going to ask my wife to encase me in a castle made of styrofoam, then light it up. I’ll ride the ebony-black plume all the way up to heaven.
9
posted on
06/06/2008 7:01:52 AM PDT
by
Junior_G
To: Brilliant
How do you think they come up with all these good ideas?
10
posted on
06/06/2008 7:02:34 AM PDT
by
Junior_G
To: Junior_G
But Seattle Parks and Recreation might do what even this week's chilly weather couldn't Ironic, eh?
11
posted on
06/06/2008 7:02:45 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Et si omnes ego non)
To: Junior_G
Yes, but fire season has started. If one of these beach bonfires gets out of hand, the entire ocean may burn.
To: Junior_G
These people for sure are right on it! No shortage of Kool Aid out on the left coast.
13
posted on
06/06/2008 7:04:14 AM PDT
by
beltfed308
(Heller: The defining moment of our Republic)
To: yldstrk
Poor Nguyen, his family fled The Commie paradise of Vietnam only to arrive into the waiting arms of all of Uncle Ho’s bastard stepchildren running Seattle.
14
posted on
06/06/2008 7:04:43 AM PDT
by
redstateconfidential
(If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
To: freedomlover
The utterly foolish thing about this is that banning bonfires does NOTHING to affect CO2 release. The only carbon dioxide (or other chemicals, for that matter) released during the burning of wood is the very same carbon dioxide (and other chemicals) that were sequestered in the wood during the time the tree was growing. The CO2 was originally taken OUT of the atmosphere by the tree over the past few decades; all the carbon in the tree came from atmospheric CO2 in the first place.
Even if you don't burn the wood, that carbon will still be released back to the air as the wood rots; it'll just happen over a somewhat longer period of time, a year or two at most in the soggy Northwest as opposed to a few hours in a bonfire on the beach.
So not only is this measure picayune, it's also utterly pointless.
15
posted on
06/06/2008 7:08:30 AM PDT
by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: Junior_G
I predict some that some building codes will not allow wood burning fireplaces in the future. Gas only. Just think. You can save the trees and the atmosphere at the same time!
*sigh!*
16
posted on
06/06/2008 7:08:38 AM PDT
by
4yearlurker
("Give them Watts boys!!")
To: Junior_G
This is good news. When moobats have to start sacrificing....anything....their cause will soon end. Without a campfire to hold hands around and sing Kumbaya, life will be meaningless for them.
To: Junior_G; Gabz
18
posted on
06/06/2008 7:12:09 AM PDT
by
libertarian27
(Land of the Fee, Home of the Shamed)
To: Junior_G
As a former lifeguard on the Jersey shore I can assure you that it's not the bonfires that generate all that heat!
Whoo Hooo!!!!
And you don't have to go in the water to catch the crabs!!
Pass the conondrum Please!
19
posted on
06/06/2008 7:14:21 AM PDT
by
Young Werther
(Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
To: Junior_G
So, what happens to the beach when no one can pick-up and burn the drift wood? And as anyone in Washington knows, there is allot of drift wood that washes up. They are either going to have to pay the Parks Department to police the beach and dispose of drift wood, or all of those beach volleyball players are going to have to find another place to play.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson