[So, every day and in every way 6,000 years is a position no one believes in.]
“Oh really, so I guess I am the only one on the planet that has ever mentioned it.... keep your blinders on my FRiend -— I will pray for you.. “
Somewhere I missed the memo that says “Ye be only saved if you believe the earth is 6000 years old.”
Good thing you don’t do science or engineering for a living, you’d be dangerous. Global warming outcomes are predicted on the reconstruction of many hundred thousand and million year cycles. Nuclear waste engineering that I’ve been involved with requires assessments of hundred thousand year old weather patterns.
I think we know who wears the binders. You barely know what the speed of light refers to, heaven help me if I have to get into Lorenz contracton.
Never mind the geologic record of volcanoes, sediment layers, erosion, diamonds, tectonic plate movements, fossil record, etc.
I think Dave is redefining what the term “fact” means to suite his ridiculous argument which is designed to stir up religous debate or illustrate his exemplary faith.
Davie boy, heaping ridicule on ones self by demonstrating near insane like ignorance (which I doubt you truly believe and no I don’t care if you do) does not make you look any more faithful than I believe you to be. It simply makes a mockery of your faith to those who do not know the good book.
I’ve encountered your type a few times and I know for a fact argument is what you seek and somehow that comforts you in reaffirming your faith by enduring what you imagine is persecution of your faith. It is not and in reality you just look silly by foisting such a ridiculous claim on us all.