David Warren . The show trial begins (Mark Steyn)

The Ottawa Citizen ^ | June 04, 2008 | David Warren

[fanfan]

[livius]

This is insane - and nothing but a small preview of the US after Osama Obama gets into power.

[kjo]

This is us in twenty years or less...McCain/Feingold has already shown the first amendment can be amended by law and the Court will uphold it.

Inch by inch we lose our rights.

[Cold Heart]

BTTT

[Paladin2]

Uh, today would be the THIRD day. This Cr@p has been reported on for two days to date, though NOT by the MSM.

[2harddrive]

An Obama + our Nation = Abomination!

[Edgar3]

Coming to a North American Union near you...

[Billthedrill]

McCain/Feingold has already shown the first amendment can be amended by law and the Court will uphold it.

Correct you are, but look on the bright side - we won't necessarily have McCain in office in January. It might be Obama instead.

I think I'll just shoot myself now.

[TheWasteLand]

I wonder if Steyn and Macleans lose, whether it might actually cause the government to get off its duff and end the national disgrace of HRC’s. If they win it will probably remain business as usual in la-la land.

[Truth29]

Twenty year? How about 2009 with President Obama and super Democrat majorities in the House and Senate?

[Dilbert San Diego]

Also, I have heard that they have censored Dr. Dobson and Focus on the Family radio broadcasts in Canada. Is this true, does Canada censor people speaking for traditional family values?

[ichabod1]

Ironic initials

[bamahead]

Here’s today’s Liveblog (just posted):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2025930/posts

[TheWasteLand]

Yeah, I thought that myself. But if HRC gets into the Supreme Court a la a BHO Presidency, HRC might bring HRC’s south of the Canadian border. Hmm, I should have used more acronyms.

[Squawk 8888]

Steyn and Macleans WILL lose and they are not even bothering to mount a defence. It appears that they want to lose so that it can be taken to the Supreme Court, which has the authority to shut down “Human Rights” tribunals as unconstitutional.

[TheWasteLand]

It appears that they want to lose so that it can be taken to the Supreme Court, which has the authority to shut down “Human Rights” tribunals as unconstitutional.

Sounds like a plan. Let's hope it works.

[fanfan]

Thanks, bamahead.

[pabianice]

Coming here soon under President Obama’s Department of Newspeak.

[thulldud]

Steyn and Macleans WILL lose and they are not even bothering to mount a defence.

Would it make any difference if they did? It's a kangaroo court.