Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Comedylover
Actually, that is counting those votes. All of them. Hillary wins unless you rename Obama “undecided.” You cannot give Hitlery the Michigan votes without counting the "Uncommitted" votes for Obama. Period. You either count Michigan and give the Uncommitted to Obama, or you don't count Michigan. Either way, Obama wins the total popular vote. We don't run elections with one person on the ballot in this country. Not to mention, everyone was well aware that a vote for Uncommitted was a vote for Obama by proxy. The "uncommitted" delegates were all vetted by "Obama for Michigan".
33 posted on 06/04/2008 7:34:40 AM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: freedomwarrior998
"You simply cannot count Michigan without giving Obama the Uncommitted."

I don't mean any disrespect, but why give Obama any votes for Michigan at all. The man took his name off the Michigan ballet. He can't cry foul when the choice to take his name off the ballet was his own.

Hillary could have taken her name off the ballet as well but she left it on. To give Obama anything in Michigan when his name was not on the ballet, by his own choice, makes him selected not elected.

45 posted on 06/04/2008 7:44:27 AM PDT by GloriaJane (http://www.download.com/gloriajane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998

” Not to mention, everyone was well aware that a vote for Uncommitted was a vote for Obama by proxy.”

Someone might have wanted to mention that to John Edwards. All that campaign money for nothing.

Iowa: 30%
Michigan: apparently 0%???


68 posted on 06/04/2008 8:15:11 AM PDT by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson