[kublia khan]

I've said it before and I’ll say it again; Africa was better off under colonization then it has ever been since.

[Nowhere Man]

I've said it before and I’ll say it again; Africa was better off under colonization then it has ever been since.

[Nowhere Man]

I've said it before and I’ll say it again; Africa was better off under colonization then it has ever been since.

Wonder why my addition didn't shoe up? Anyways, I agree with you, it was better under colonial rule. Then again, if I were them, I'd rather stand and fight, preferably with an M1 Garand, but on the other hand, they should have gotten out. I know it would be hard to leave your home but Mugabe and his mob are like giant ants, sometimes it is better to leave for safer places. Anyways, without those farmers, they will starve. Let them starve then and then we can move back into Africa.

[buwaya]

“I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; Africa was better off under colonization then it has ever been since.”

Very true. Some other parts of the world as well.

[Riverman94610]

Ina material sense,perhaps.Though colonial rule was not implememted to benefit the Africans,but the European colonizers.
The illogic of your thinking to me-and with all respect-is that colonial society was based on what I think is a liberal rationale-”Oh,those poor colored people.They are so helpless and incapable.The need the white man to provide for them”
To me that attitude is similiar to white libs in THIS country.Stay on the Dem plantation and we will take care of you.
Doesn’t work here and it really didn’t work too well for Africans.