Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vortigern
Once the court makes a ruling, what could a candidate do to thwart the ruling if they disagree with it? Their personal opinion at that point has little if any value.

You have to understand that doesn't matter to the fourth estate/fifth column. If the Supreme Court rules using strict scrutiny that it is an individual right, the drive by media will go crazy with "blood in the streets" stories. The gun grabbers will try to infringe in other ways, e.g. restrictions on ammo sales, gun show "loophole", etc.

22 posted on 06/03/2008 11:14:58 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Agreed. My hope is that the Supreme Court is wise enough to consider these additional attacks that may come in future years and make a strong ruling that addresses at least some of the other attacks such as ammo taxes as well. I guess they can do that? I hope?

In any event, considering what we may be facing soon, we need the strongest Pro 2nd Amendment ruling possible.


25 posted on 06/03/2008 11:24:11 AM PDT by VOR78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson