Is that right? I thought perhaps he had "officiated" at a false possibly polygamous marriage to an underage girl.
I wasn't aware that he wasn't present. Did he order the sexual consummation of the marriage? Or just the marriage?
Here is my question.
If jeffs can be convicted of accomplice to rape I believe they called it.
Dose his conviction open up other ministers to the same charge if they married a young girl (possibility a legal marriage) who becomes unhappy in the marriage later.
This is based on my belief that if the young lady had not been unhappy at some point she would of not fussed.