Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Navy Patriot
Navy Patriot said: "The judge will probably get whacked again on the heavy handedness of the release orders,..."

I hope so. Every agreement signed by any of these parents were signed under duress, with their children already in custody and the threat to keep them there if agreement was not reached. From what I can see, there is only ONE of over 400 cases which is getting a different treatment.

The lawyers should appeal a second time and the Appeals Court should order all existing agreements to be voided and re-negotiated between CPS and individual families without the unjustified duress of continued state custody.

15 posted on 06/02/2008 2:15:08 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

Every agreement signed by any of these parents were signed under duress.


They are free to file an appeal about the order vacating the original order taking the children into custody. The order from the Supreme court allowed for the judge to place restrictions.

The order in it’s entirety is here if you care to read it..... Not long but does spell out what can and can’t be done.

http://web.gosanangelo.com/pdf/flds0602.pdf


16 posted on 06/02/2008 2:32:12 PM PDT by deport ( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson