Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salena Zito

Whatever her decision Clinton has emerged from this battle with Obama a better person, a better candidate and probably the most electable nominee that Democrats have fielded since her husband. It is too bad that the superdelegates cannot see beyond the ends of their own noses or self interest to realize that they are dismissing someone that has proved they can win under the grossest of odds.


Well, I’ve never understood how Hillary is allagedly so “electable”. She came into this campaign with very high negatives, and those negatives have been reinforced by her and Bill’s behavior in this campaign.

If the super-delegates collectively exercised their independent judgement and thought Hillary should be the nominee, the fallout from that decision could be to severely depress voter turnout in November among groups who have supported Obama thus far. So it is not clear that Hillary has emerged as the most electable nominee when you consider factors such as this.

I just don’t see how Hillary has emerged from all of this as a better person, when she is clearly a political chameleon (sp?) who has run a negative campaign based on half-truths and innuendo.

I do agree she is a better candidate now than in the beginning. But so is Obama, so not sure why that means the super-delegates should move en masse to Hillary.

The super-delegates have to make their decisions based on whatever criteria they want. Some are self-interest to be sure. Others are based on the party as a whole. Months ago, when Hillary was still the front runner, some party insiders had expressed concern that Hillary as the nominee would hurt the down ballot races.

Whatever the case, two candidates have essential fought to a draw in this contest for the Dem. nomination. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.


2 posted on 06/01/2008 2:14:44 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego
Well, I’ve never understood how Hillary is allagedly so “electable”. She came into this campaign with very high negatives, and those negatives have been reinforced by her and Bill’s behavior in this campaign

Ironically the last couple months Obama has made her look relatively good by comparison. I still don't think she would wear well in a general election campaign however. It's one thing to court the choir, something else to venture into hostile territory.

4 posted on 06/01/2008 2:26:44 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The only thing that can make hillary look good, for the moment at least, is that Obama is so very, very bad.

Hillary would make a terrible president, but Obama would be far worse—which I don’t say lightly. And I think people are beginning to wonder about him, although the moonbats are not yet willing to admit any doubts, even to themselves, because that would be racist.


5 posted on 06/01/2008 2:35:20 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I do agree she is a better candidate now than in the beginning. But so is Obama

Obama's a better candidate now than he was four months ago?

ROFL!

11 posted on 06/01/2008 3:48:29 PM PDT by browardchad ("We are all mavericks now." -- Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson