To: bcsco
I'm not trying to parse words here but the false messiah has never made a direct condemnation of “Black Liberation Theology” to my knowledge. In fact, he refuses to answer any question concerning the tenants of this “religious” philosophy. The fact that he's listened to it's teachings for the last 20 years should make him an expert by now. In my eyes his actions are even worse than staying at this hate fest because according to what he's saying he left to protect it, not to condemn it.
31 posted on
06/01/2008 4:43:08 AM PDT by
RU88
(The false messiah can not change water into wine any more than he can get unity from diversity.)
To: RU88
In another thread Obama was quoted as saying he was leaving the church because he didn’t want to have to continue explaining them. He didn’t condemn them, he’s leaving because he doesn’t want the millstone around his neck during his run for office. That’s throwing the church under the bus.
But “Black Liberation Theology” is not Christianity. I’ve never been to such a church, but I question whether they even “worship” God. It would appear they “use” God’s Word as a means to roil the people against Whitey and the U.S.
46 posted on
06/01/2008 5:00:54 AM PDT by
bcsco
(To heck with a third party. We need a second one....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson