Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: festus
Good to see at least one judge in TX understands what needs to be done.

You mean by refusing to sign the order that overturned her decision that was subsequently upheld by the state supreme court? Is that what needs to be done?

7 posted on 05/30/2008 5:38:44 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: johniegrad

Actually she’ll sign it its the FLDS that refuse.

She wasn’t even mandated to return the kids immediately. The TX appeals ruling stopped short of that.


11 posted on 05/30/2008 5:45:17 PM PDT by festus (Tagline removed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: johniegrad

Most of these children are going back because the Supreme Court ruled they aren’t in imminent danger. That doesn’t mean the children don’t need protecting, and the court will oversee that.


21 posted on 05/30/2008 6:06:42 PM PDT by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson