Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patton

My thoughts have centered around the individual hearings and the lack there of. If this was not the law, why did the state appoint attorneys for the mothers, even those that weren’t minors, AND an attorney ad litem for EACH child?

Obviously they knew what was required and chose to ignore it.


135 posted on 05/30/2008 9:41:40 PM PDT by SouthTexas (If you are not living on the edge, you are taking up too much space!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: SouthTexas; Diamond

Sorry, I neglected to respond to this one.

I see two fundemental issues with the progress of these cases.

First, that CPS treated them all as one, which appears to be in violation of law.

I think it was Diamond who said, “mass guilt is not a hallmark of due process”, or similar.

2nd, that the lower court did the same.

Judge Walther seems to STILL be doing that, as does CPS.

If the TX SC intravenes again, it will probably be to say BAD DOGGIE! on this exact point.

But, what do I know? IANAL.


141 posted on 05/30/2008 10:06:09 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

To: SouthTexas

I think the judge was trying to scramble eggs as fast as possible so she could not be undone.


143 posted on 05/30/2008 10:09:31 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson