Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bernard Marx
An insidious change has already taken place because of this decision; one not recognized by most people, and discounted by the left. "Brides" and "Grooms" can no longer legally be called by these terms based on reason and reality, since the wording the CA marriage license has been changed to refer to "Partner A" and Partner B." So natural heterosexuality has been supplanted by a new-world order terminology by the decision of 4 "feelers" and the quick stroke of a pen. I would doubt that a man and woman getting married would have the option of using the old form - thus the radical left has won the war of words and ideas in this state.

Quick question: If the marriage amendment passes in November, will the marriage license forms revert back to the traditional wording, or will the time and money to reprint be the excuse of the left to keep the ground won in hopes that they will have another chance at battle?

23 posted on 05/31/2008 7:14:32 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

In regards to November’s marriage amendment do you really think that most citizens want the government to limit liberty? I think the chances of the marriage amendment being approved by the public is somewhere between slim & none, the only way this could ever become law is by decree.


24 posted on 05/31/2008 7:39:36 AM PDT by DoingTheFrenchMistake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson