Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Utah Girl
From the article: "The agreement is being discussed ..."

The parents' lawyers should recognize that they have the upper hand at this moment. The CPS was shot down, in part, because there is no way that a "one-size-fits-all" taking of the children could be justified. The same is true of any "one-size-fits-all" parental agreements.

The parents should insist on the return of the children and have their day in court to decide on particular agreements. The Texas Supreme Court decision does not mean that the parents must agree to anything at all. All the next steps must be justified by the CPS.

15 posted on 05/30/2008 2:28:21 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

Yep. I think the FLDS have wised up and will make sure their individual rights are protected.


16 posted on 05/30/2008 2:29:13 PM PDT by Utah Girl (John 15:12, Matthew 5:44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: William Tell
The parents are all going to ask for their kiddies to be returned to the exact same address. The Appeals Court said, essentially, they resided at different addresses.

Watch for a further dust up on that particular point.

They do, really, have only one address - much like Bill Gates, world's richest man. He has one address, one residence, multiple buildings. Somewhere in there he worships at the MS-Dos temple, and then there's the Windows temple.

The only differencce between Bill Gates residence and that of the F(lds) is that he paid for his. No one knows who paid for theirs.

44 posted on 05/30/2008 4:12:03 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson