When do they have to show cause for these restrictions!
I would not sign a dang thing to get back my children if I were accused.
The Judge should be “hearing” the evidence and should act in the “best” interests of the rights of all parties.
It seems to me that this Judge has a horse in this race.
That is not impartial and that is not justice.
The children who are in danger should be dealt with separately from the children who are not.
This cannot be treated as an en masse prosecution and I believe that is what the higher court had a problem with.
Judge Walther apparently does not agree.
Before he restrictions are imposed, in Court before a Judge, where the parents (and in some cases the children separately) must be represented. Presumably on an individual case basis as well, not en masse, especially in this case where the Texas Supreme Court has indicated that treating the whole ranch as a single resident was improper.