Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob J
I agree with you but got a better idea, how about we divide ALL the states up into 3 groups and hold those primaries on three consecutive weeks?

The primary system probably should be revamped but we have to be careful. If you put too many states together it would have the effect of eliminating low budget candidates. This time it would have been only McCain, Romney and Giuliani competing.

Reagan was nominated with the same system we have now. It knocks out the conservatives that are not acceptable to the country at large. That, at the expense of pure conservative or regional candidates.

42 posted on 05/30/2008 1:00:10 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: MARTIAL MONK

So you’re saying the system worked, even if we ended up with a candidate that didn’t meet the ideological purity test?


45 posted on 05/30/2008 1:07:19 AM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: MARTIAL MONK

Yep, I think the system works. Michigan, New Hampshire and South Carolina are representative states. A strong candidate has a chance, even with a limited budget. That was the rational behind McCain’s Straight Talk Express. It was low buck but drew attention. It worked.


62 posted on 05/30/2008 1:33:18 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson