Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: porgygirl
... and a loony left judge will declare it unconstitutional.

Oh that will almost certainly happen. However, the issue WILL be on the ballot in November, which will hurt the obamessiah in a state that he is very much counting on turning from red to blue.

This is great news!

15 posted on 05/29/2008 4:56:24 PM PDT by rhinohunter (Welcome back to the GOP "glory" days of Gerald Ford and Bob Michel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: rhinohunter
I checked out Daily Kos. The lib argument is pro-lifers want to protect a blastocyst - a clump of fertilized cells that's not even a recognizable person and they want to outlaw abstinence! There's a difference between something that's not life and has human potentiality, once its fertilized. I'd like to know when the Left think personhood begins. As for abstinence, its funny that the same people who believe in safe sex are now concerned people won't be able to NOT have sex if the personhood amendment is passed. Just wanted to give a heads up on what libs are thinking about it today.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

16 posted on 05/29/2008 5:16:49 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson